From: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix device removal when no queues exist
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0501MB23142E2FC0337C37054B3747D1900@HE1PR0501MB2314.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E0EA271-1891-4336-BCB8-A1A6A6F0BDF3@intel.com>
Hi Keith,
Please find comments inline
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wiles, Keith [mailto:keith.wiles@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 4:00 PM
> To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>; Thomas
> Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>;
> Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix device removal when no queues exist
>
>
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 2:47 AM, Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > TAP device is created following its first queue creation. Multiple
> > queues can be added or removed over time. In Linux terminology those
> > are file descriptors which are opened or closed over time. As long as
> > the number of opened file descriptors is positive - TAP device will
> > appear as a Linux device. In case all queues are released (the
> > equivalent of all file descriptors being closed) the TAP device will
> > be removed. This can lead to abnormalities in different scenarios
> > where the TAP device should exist even if all its queues are released.
> > In order to make TAP existence independent of its number of queues -
> > an extra file descriptor is opened on TAP creation and is closed on
> > TAP closure. It's only purpose is to serve as a keep-alive mechanism
> > for the TAP device.
> >
> > Fixes: bf7b7f437b49 ("net/tap: create netdevice during probing")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > v1:
> > Initial release
> > v2:
> > Reword commit message (a fixing patch)
> >
> > drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> I did not see where ka_fd is set to -1 at startup, just in case we fail before the
> first open attempt and possible hit the close code in the remove routine. I did
> not look at the complete driver, but I think it maybe reasonable to add that
> initial variable setup.
>
Your concern is in place. However, please note that ka_fd is allocated and initialized to 0 as part of private device structure initialization during the call to:
dev = rte_eth_vdev_allocate(vdev, sizeof(*pmd));
Therefore it is guaranteed to be 0 in case we fail before the first open attempt and if we hit the close code we will not be closing anything wrong (closing a 0 fd has no effect).
While reading the code again I have noticed that tun_alloc() always return -1 so no need to reassign ka_fd to -1 after calling tun_alloc. Also I have fixed a typo in the commit message: It's --> Its.
I have sent v3 with the above small changes.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c index c006d07..6901edc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > @@ -929,6 +929,15 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
> > &internals->remote_initial_flags);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (internals->ka_fd != -1) {
> > + close(internals->ka_fd);
> > + internals->ka_fd = -1;
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * Since TUN device has no more opened file descriptors
> > + * it will be removed from kernel
> > + */
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > @@ -1561,13 +1570,18 @@ eth_dev_tap_create(struct rte_vdev_device
> *vdev, char *tap_name,
> > rte_memcpy(&pmd->eth_addr, mac_addr,
> sizeof(*mac_addr));
> > }
> >
> > - /* Immediately create the netdevice (this will create the 1st queue).
> */
> > - /* rx queue */
> > - if (tap_setup_queue(dev, pmd, 0, 1) == -1)
> > - goto error_exit;
> > - /* tx queue */
> > - if (tap_setup_queue(dev, pmd, 0, 0) == -1)
> > + /*
> > + * Allocate a TUN device keep-alive file descriptor that will only be
> > + * closed when the TUN device itself is closed or removed.
> > + * This keep-alive file descriptor will guarantee that the TUN device
> > + * exists even when all of its queues are closed
> > + */
> > + pmd->ka_fd = tun_alloc(pmd);
> > + if (pmd->ka_fd < 0) {
> > + pmd->ka_fd = -1;
> > + TAP_LOG(ERR, "Unable to create %s interface",
> tuntap_name);
> > goto error_exit;
> > + }
> >
> > ifr.ifr_mtu = dev->data->mtu;
> > if (tap_ioctl(pmd, SIOCSIFMTU, &ifr, 1, LOCAL_AND_REMOTE) < 0)
> @@
> > -1961,9 +1975,12 @@ rte_pmd_tap_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >
> > close(internals->ioctl_sock);
> > rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> > -
> > rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev);
> >
> > + if (internals->ka_fd != -1) {
> > + close(internals->ka_fd);
> > + internals->ka_fd = -1;
> > + }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h
> > b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h index babe42d..575dce4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct pmd_internals {
> > struct rx_queue rxq[RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES]; /* List of RX
> queues */
> > struct tx_queue txq[RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES]; /* List of TX
> queues */
> > struct rte_intr_handle intr_handle; /* LSC interrupt handle. */
> > + int ka_fd; /* keep-alive file descriptor */
> > };
> >
> > /* tap_intr.c */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
> Regards,
> Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 16:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/tap: keep device alive " Ophir Munk
2018-05-17 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix device removal " Ophir Munk
2018-05-17 12:59 ` Wiles, Keith
2018-05-18 8:38 ` Ophir Munk [this message]
2018-05-18 8:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ophir Munk
2018-05-21 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ophir Munk
2018-05-21 12:52 ` Wiles, Keith
2018-05-21 15:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-23 4:50 ` [dpdk-dev] " Varghese, Vipin
2018-05-23 4:53 ` Wiles, Keith
2018-05-23 5:22 ` Varghese, Vipin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=HE1PR0501MB23142E2FC0337C37054B3747D1900@HE1PR0501MB2314.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
--cc=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).