DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:00:57 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0801MB20258C304AE23716F6CE67999E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3f83d51-0e0a-49ab-adf3-0b4ae3bdd3e4@intel.com>


From: Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 8:37 PM
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; mdr@ashroe.eu; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests


Hi Ruifeng,

Just a few nits

[Ruifeng] Thank you for reviewing this patch.
On 07/07/2020 16:15, Ruifeng Wang wrote:

Add positive and negative tests for API rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add.

Also test LPM library behavior when RCU QSBR is enabled.



Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com><mailto:ruifeng.wang@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com><mailto:gavin.hu@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com><mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>

---

 app/test/test_lpm.c | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-

 1 file changed, 290 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c

index 3a3fd097f..93742e3c7 100644

--- a/app/test/test_lpm.c

+++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@



 #include <rte_ip.h>

 #include <rte_lpm.h>

+#include <rte_malloc.h>



 #include "test.h"

 #include "test_xmmt_ops.h"

@@ -40,6 +41,9 @@ static int32_t test15(void);

 static int32_t test16(void);

 static int32_t test17(void);

 static int32_t test18(void);

+static int32_t test19(void);

+static int32_t test20(void);

+static int32_t test21(void);



 rte_lpm_test tests[] = {

 /* Test Cases */

@@ -61,7 +65,10 @@ rte_lpm_test tests[] = {

        test15,

        test16,

        test17,

-       test18

+       test18,

+       test19,

+       test20,

+       test21

 };



 #define MAX_DEPTH 32

@@ -1265,6 +1272,288 @@ test18(void)

        return PASS;

 }



+/*

+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add positive and negative tests.

+ *  - Add RCU QSBR variable to LPM

+ *  - Add another RCU QSBR variable to LPM

+ *  - Check returns

+ */

+int32_t

+test19(void)

+{

+       struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;

+       struct rte_lpm_config config;

+       size_t sz;

+       struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv;

+       struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv2;

+       int32_t status;

+       struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};

+

+       config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;

+       config.number_tbl8s = NUMBER_TBL8S;

+       config.flags = 0;

+

+       lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);

+

+       /* Create RCU QSBR variable */

+       sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(RTE_MAX_LCORE);

+       qsv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,

+                                      RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv != NULL);

+

+       status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(qsv, RTE_MAX_LCORE);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       rcu_cfg.v = qsv;

+       /* Invalid QSBR mode */

+       rcu_cfg.mode = 2;

+       status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);

+

+       rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;

+       /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */

+       status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       /* Create and attach another RCU QSBR to LPM table */

+       qsv2 = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,

+                                      RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv2 != NULL);

+

+       rcu_cfg.v = qsv2;

+       rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;

+       status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);

+

+       rte_lpm_free(lpm);

+       rte_free(qsv);

+       rte_free(qsv2);

+

+       return PASS;

+}

+

+/*

+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add DQ mode functional test.

+ * Reader and writer are in the same thread in this test.

+ *  - Create LPM which supports 1 tbl8 group at max

+ *  - Add RCU QSBR variable to LPM

+ *  - Add a rule with depth=28 (> 24)

+ *  - Register a reader thread (not a real thread)

+ *  - Reader lookup existing rule

+ *  - Writer delete the rule

+ *  - Reader lookup the rule

+ *  - Writer re-add the rule (no available tbl8 group)

+ *  - Reader report quiescent state and unregister

+ *  - Writer re-add the rule

+ *  - Reader lookup the rule

+ */

+int32_t

+test20(void)

+{

+       struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;

+       struct rte_lpm_config config;

+       size_t sz;

+       struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv;

+       int32_t status;

+       uint32_t ip, next_hop, next_hop_return;

+       uint8_t depth;

+       struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};

+

+       config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;

+       config.number_tbl8s = 1;

+       config.flags = 0;

+

+       lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);

+

+       /* Create RCU QSBR variable */

+       sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(1);

+       qsv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,

+                              RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv != NULL);

+

+       status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(qsv, 1);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       rcu_cfg.v = qsv;

+       rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;

+       /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */

+       status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 100, 100);



This is a globally routed ip, it looks like you missed "6" in the second octet. Here it is better to use the rfc5737 address, rather than rfc1918.

[Ruifeng] Agreed. Use reserved address is better. Will change to rfc5737 address in next version.



+       depth = 28;

+       next_hop = 1;

+       status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);

+

+       /* Register pseudo reader */

+       status = rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(qsv, 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(qsv, 0);

+

+       status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(next_hop_return == next_hop);

+

+       /* Writer update */

+       status = rte_lpm_delete(lpm, ip, depth);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(!lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid);

+

+       status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);

+

+       status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);

+

+       /* Reader quiescent */

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(qsv, 0);

+

+       status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline(qsv, 0);

+       status = rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(qsv, 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(next_hop_return == next_hop);

+

+       rte_lpm_free(lpm);

+       rte_free(qsv);

+

+       return PASS;

+}

+

+static struct rte_lpm *g_lpm;

+static struct rte_rcu_qsbr *g_v;

+static uint32_t g_ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 100, 100);



Same here as above

[Ruifeng] Will change. Thank you.



+static volatile uint8_t writer_done;

+/* Report quiescent state interval every 1024 lookups. Larger critical

+ * sections in reader will result in writer polling multiple times.

+ */

+#define QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL 1024

+#define WRITER_ITERATIONS     512

+

+/*

+ * Reader thread using rte_lpm data structure with RCU.

+ */

+static int

+test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader(void *arg)

+{

+       int i;

+       uint32_t next_hop_return = 0;

+

+       RTE_SET_USED(arg);

+       /* Register this thread to report quiescent state */

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(g_v, 0);

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(g_v, 0);

+

+       do {

+               for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)

+                       rte_lpm_lookup(g_lpm, g_ip, &next_hop_return);

+

+               /* Update quiescent state */

+               rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(g_v, 0);

+       } while (!writer_done);

+

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline(g_v, 0);

+       rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(g_v, 0);

+

+       return 0;

+}

+

+/*

+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add sync mode functional test.

+ * 1 Reader and 1 writer. They cannot be in the same thread in this test.

+ *  - Create LPM which supports 1 tbl8 group at max

+ *  - Add RCU QSBR variable with sync mode to LPM

+ *  - Register a reader thread. Reader keeps looking up a specific rule.

+ *  - Writer keeps adding and deleting a specific rule with depth=28 (> 24)

+ */

+int32_t

+test21(void)

+{

+       struct rte_lpm_config config;

+       size_t sz;

+       int32_t status;

+       uint32_t i, next_hop;

+       uint8_t depth;

+       struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};

+

+       if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {

+               printf("Not enough cores for %s, expecting at least 2\n",

+                       __func__);

+               return TEST_SKIPPED;

+       }

+

+       config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;

+       config.number_tbl8s = 1;

+       config.flags = 0;

+

+       g_lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(g_lpm != NULL);

+

+       /* Create RCU QSBR variable */

+       sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(1);

+       g_v = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,

+                              RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(g_v != NULL);

+

+       status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(g_v, 1);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       rcu_cfg.v = g_v;

+       rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;

+       /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */

+       status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(g_lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);

+       TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);

+

+       writer_done = 0;

+       /* Launch reader thread */

+       rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,

+                              rte_get_next_lcore(-1, 1, 0));

+

+       depth = 28;

+       next_hop = 1;

+       status = rte_lpm_add(g_lpm, g_ip, depth, next_hop);

+       if (status != 0) {

+               printf("%s: Failed to add rule\n", __func__);

+               goto error;

+       }

+

+       /* Writer update */

+       for (i = 0; i < WRITER_ITERATIONS; i++) {

+               status = rte_lpm_delete(g_lpm, g_ip, depth);

+               if (status != 0) {

+                       printf("%s: Failed to delete rule at iteration %d\n",

+                              __func__, i);

+                       goto error;

+               }

+

+               status = rte_lpm_add(g_lpm, g_ip, depth, next_hop);

+               if (status != 0) {

+                       printf("%s: Failed to add rule at iteration %d\n",

+                              __func__, i);

+                       goto error;

+               }

+       }

+

+error:

+       writer_done = 1;

+       /* Wait until reader exited. */

+       rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();

+

+       rte_lpm_free(g_lpm);

+       rte_free(g_v);

+

+       return (status == 0) ? PASS : -1;

+}

+

 /*

  * Do all unit tests.

  */



Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com><mailto:vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>







--

Regards,

Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-08 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23  1:23   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26  3:11     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26  5:32       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19  6:17       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19  6:22       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07  9:01           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09  4:25             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11  5:03                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14  4:11                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03  6:29         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04  6:07             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13  4:35                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03  6:42         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13  3:02         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18  3:47             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20  8:19             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:36         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  8:42           ` David Marchand
2020-04-22  8:51             ` David Marchand
2020-04-22  9:26               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:27         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:25         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09  3:48         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07  9:21       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13  4:36         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18  3:32             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02       ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03  9:09         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08  5:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-22  5:46         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23  4:34           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56       ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35           ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03  7:43         ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33       ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30       ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00         ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49       ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:29       ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:29       ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34       ` Ruifeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=HE1PR0801MB20258C304AE23716F6CE67999E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git