DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 06:07:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB38075F3F06183AA6E3A7B5F0F7099@MN2PR11MB3807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527081714.1367611-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:17 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com; Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>;
> Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx
> 
> For i40e scalar Tx path, if implement FAST_FREE_MBUF mode, it means per-
> queue all mbufs come from the same mempool and have refcnt = 1.
> 
> Thus we can use bulk free of the buffers when mbuf fast free mode is
> enabled.
> 
> For scalar path in arm platform:
> In n1sdp, performance is improved by 7.8%; In thunderx2, performance is
> improved by 6.7%.
> 
> For scalar path in x86 platform,
> performance is improved by 6%.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 6c58decece..fe7b20f750 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -1295,6 +1295,7 @@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)  {
>  	struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
>  	uint16_t i;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *free[RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ];
> 
>  	if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
>  			rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> @@ -1308,9 +1309,11 @@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
> 
>  	if (txq->offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < txq->tx_rs_thresh; ++i, ++txep) {
> -			rte_mempool_put(txep->mbuf->pool, txep->mbuf);
> +			free[i] = txep->mbuf;

The tx_rs_thresh can be 'nb_desc - 3', so if tx_rs_thres > RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ, there'll be out of bounds, right?

>  			txep->mbuf = NULL;
>  		}
> +		rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free,
> +					txq->tx_rs_thresh);
>  	} else {
>  		for (i = 0; i < txq->tx_rs_thresh; ++i, ++txep) {
>  			rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(txep->mbuf);
> --
> 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-22  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27  8:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] net/i40e: improve free mbuf Feifei Wang
2021-05-27  8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx Feifei Wang
2021-06-22  6:07   ` Xing, Beilei [this message]
2021-06-22  9:58     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-06-22 10:08       ` Feifei Wang
2021-06-23  7:02         ` [dpdk-dev] " Xing, Beilei
2021-06-25  9:40           ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-06-28  2:27             ` [dpdk-dev] " Xing, Beilei
2021-06-28  2:28               ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-27  8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] net/i40e: improve performance for vector Tx Feifei Wang
2021-06-22  1:52 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH v1 0/2] net/i40e: improve free mbuf Feifei Wang
2021-06-30  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] net/i40e: improve free mbuf for Tx Feifei Wang
2021-06-30  6:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/i40e: improve performance for scalar Tx Feifei Wang
2021-06-30  6:59     ` Xing, Beilei
2021-06-30  6:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: improve performance for vector Tx Feifei Wang
2021-07-01 12:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] net/i40e: improve free mbuf for Tx Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB38075F3F06183AA6E3A7B5F0F7099@MN2PR11MB3807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).