From: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"matan@mellanox.com" <matan@mellanox.com>,
"Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>,
"Wang, Yinan" <yinan.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] net/vhost: fix interrupt mode
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:18:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4063471FFA9EBD6E7A51F5B39C700@MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729133626.237098-4-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 9:36 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; matan@mellanox.com; Xia, Chenbo
> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan
> <yinan.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>;
> david.marchand@redhat.com; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] net/vhost: fix interrupt mode
>
> At .new_device() time, only the first vring pair is now ready, other vrings are
> configured later.
>
> Problem is that when application will setup and enable interrupts, only the first
> queue pair Rx interrupt will be enabled.
>
> This patches fixes the issue by setting the number of max interrupts to the
> number of Rx queues that will be later initialized. Then, as soon as a Rx vring is
> ready and interrupt enabled by the application, it removes the corresponding
> uninitialized epoll event, and installs a new one with the valid FD.
>
> Fixes: 604052ae5395 ("net/vhost: support queue update")
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> index 951929c663..e55278af69 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <sys/epoll.h>
>
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> #include <rte_ethdev_driver.h>
> @@ -95,6 +96,8 @@ struct vhost_queue {
> uint16_t port;
> uint16_t virtqueue_id;
> struct vhost_stats stats;
> + int intr_enable;
> + rte_spinlock_t intr_lock;
> };
>
> struct pmd_internal {
> @@ -524,12 +527,58 @@ find_internal_resource(char *ifname)
> return list;
> }
>
> +static int
> +eth_vhost_update_intr(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint16_t rxq_idx) {
> + struct rte_intr_handle *handle = eth_dev->intr_handle;
> + struct rte_epoll_event rev;
> + int epfd, ret;
> +
> + if (!handle)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (handle->efds[rxq_idx] == handle->elist[rxq_idx].fd)
> + return 0;
> +
> + VHOST_LOG(INFO, "kickfd for rxq-%d was changed, updating
> handler.\n",
> + rxq_idx);
> +
> + if (handle->elist[rxq_idx].fd != -1)
> + VHOST_LOG(ERR, "Unexpected previous kickfd value (Got %d,
> expected -1).\n",
> + handle->elist[rxq_idx].fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * First remove invalid epoll event, and then install
> + * the new one. May be solved with a proper API in the
> + * future.
> + */
> + epfd = handle->elist[rxq_idx].epfd;
> + rev = handle->elist[rxq_idx];
> + ret = rte_epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, rev.fd,
> + &handle->elist[rxq_idx]);
> + if (ret) {
> + VHOST_LOG(ERR, "Delete epoll event failed.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + rev.fd = handle->efds[rxq_idx];
> + handle->elist[rxq_idx] = rev;
> + ret = rte_epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, rev.fd,
> + &handle->elist[rxq_idx]);
> + if (ret) {
> + VHOST_LOG(ERR, "Add epoll event failed.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> eth_rxq_intr_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qid) {
> struct rte_vhost_vring vring;
> struct vhost_queue *vq;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int old_intr_enable, ret = 0;
>
> vq = dev->data->rx_queues[qid];
> if (!vq) {
> @@ -537,6 +586,18 @@ eth_rxq_intr_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t
> qid)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->intr_lock);
> + old_intr_enable = vq->intr_enable;
> + vq->intr_enable = 1;
> + ret = eth_vhost_update_intr(dev, qid);
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->intr_lock);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + VHOST_LOG(ERR, "Failed to update rxq%d's intr\n", qid);
> + vq->intr_enable = old_intr_enable;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> ret = rte_vhost_get_vhost_vring(vq->vid, (qid << 1) + 1, &vring);
> if (ret < 0) {
> VHOST_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get rxq%d's vring\n", qid); @@ -
> 571,6 +632,8 @@ eth_rxq_intr_disable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t qid)
> rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification(vq->vid, (qid << 1) + 1, 0);
> rte_wmb();
>
> + vq->intr_enable = 0;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -593,7 +656,6 @@ eth_vhost_install_intr(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> struct rte_vhost_vring vring;
> struct vhost_queue *vq;
> - int count = 0;
> int nb_rxq = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
> int i;
> int ret;
> @@ -623,6 +685,8 @@ eth_vhost_install_intr(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>
> VHOST_LOG(INFO, "Prepare intr vec\n");
> for (i = 0; i < nb_rxq; i++) {
> + dev->intr_handle->intr_vec[i] = RTE_INTR_VEC_RXTX_OFFSET +
> i;
> + dev->intr_handle->efds[i] = -1;
> vq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
> if (!vq) {
> VHOST_LOG(INFO, "rxq-%d not setup yet, skip!\n", i);
> @@ -641,14 +705,12 @@ eth_vhost_install_intr(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> "rxq-%d's kickfd is invalid, skip!\n", i);
> continue;
> }
> - dev->intr_handle->intr_vec[i] = RTE_INTR_VEC_RXTX_OFFSET +
> i;
> dev->intr_handle->efds[i] = vring.kickfd;
> - count++;
> VHOST_LOG(INFO, "Installed intr vec for rxq-%d\n", i);
> }
>
> - dev->intr_handle->nb_efd = count;
> - dev->intr_handle->max_intr = count + 1;
> + dev->intr_handle->nb_efd = nb_rxq;
> + dev->intr_handle->max_intr = nb_rxq + 1;
> dev->intr_handle->type = RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VDEV;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -835,6 +897,7 @@ vring_conf_update(int vid, struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> uint16_t vring_id) {
> struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf = ð_dev->data->dev_conf;
> struct pmd_internal *internal = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> + struct vhost_queue *vq;
> struct rte_vhost_vring vring;
> int rx_idx = vring_id % 2 ? (vring_id - 1) >> 1 : -1;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -853,12 +916,18 @@ vring_conf_update(int vid, struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev, uint16_t vring_id)
> vring_id);
> return ret;
> }
> + eth_dev->intr_handle->efds[rx_idx] = vring.kickfd;
>
> - if (vring.kickfd != eth_dev->intr_handle->efds[rx_idx]) {
> - VHOST_LOG(INFO, "kickfd for rxq-%d was changed.\n",
> - rx_idx);
> - eth_dev->intr_handle->efds[rx_idx] = vring.kickfd;
> + vq = eth_dev->data->rx_queues[rx_idx];
> + if (!vq) {
> + VHOST_LOG(ERR, "rxq%d is not setup yet\n", rx_idx);
> + return -1;
> }
> +
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->intr_lock);
> + if (vq->intr_enable)
> + ret = eth_vhost_update_intr(eth_dev, rx_idx);
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->intr_lock);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1152,6 +1221,7 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint16_t rx_queue_id,
>
> vq->mb_pool = mb_pool;
> vq->virtqueue_id = rx_queue_id * VIRTIO_QNUM + VIRTIO_TXQ;
> + rte_spinlock_init(&vq->intr_lock);
> dev->data->rx_queues[rx_queue_id] = vq;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1173,6 +1243,7 @@ eth_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint16_t tx_queue_id,
> }
>
> vq->virtqueue_id = tx_queue_id * VIRTIO_QNUM + VIRTIO_RXQ;
> + rte_spinlock_init(&vq->intr_lock);
> dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id] = vq;
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.26.2
Reviewed-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 13:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix Vhost regressions Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-29 13:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] vhost: fix guest notification setting Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-29 13:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] net/vhost: fix queue update Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-29 13:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] net/vhost: fix interrupt mode Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-29 14:18 ` Xia, Chenbo [this message]
2020-07-30 5:48 ` Xiao, QimaiX
2020-07-29 14:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix Vhost regressions Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB4063471FFA9EBD6E7A51F5B39C700@MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yinan.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).