DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	Somalapuram Amaranath <asomalap@amd.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	John Griffin <john.griffin@intel.com>,
	Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	Michael Shamis <michaelsh@marvell.com>,
	Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
	ArkadiuszX Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
	 Sasha Kotchubievsky <sashakot@nvidia.com>,
	Oren Duer <oren@nvidia.com>, Shiri Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: formalize key wrap method in API
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:49:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR12MB249231ECD7FB2A2BF328FFEBDF769@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR18MB22849ED15ED76D83702E8667D8769@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>



From: Akhil Goyal
> > Hi Akhil
> >
> > From: Akhil Goyal
> > > Hi Matan,
> > >
> > > > The Key Wrap approach is used by applications in order to protect
> > > > keys located in untrusted storage or transmitted over untrusted
> > > > communications networks. The constructions are typically built
> > > > from standard primitives such as block ciphers and cryptographic
> > > > hash functions.
> > > >
> > > > The Key Wrap method and its parameters are a secret between the
> > > > keys provider and the device, means that the device is
> > > > preconfigured for this method using very secured way.
> > > >
> > > > The key wrap method may change the key length and layout.
> > > >
> > > > Add a description for the cipher transformation key to allow
> > > > wrapped key to be forwarded by the same API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > How will the driver gets notified whether the key is wrapped or not?
> > > The driver would expect the keys are as per the capabilities exposed.
> > > If it does not check as per the capabilities, how will it identify a
> > > bad Key len
> > and
> > > the wrapped key length?
> >
> > As I wrote, the device is preconfigured to the key wrapping mode in
> > very secured way.
> > No one knows this secret except the device and the key provider
> > (outside the crypto lib and dpdk application).
> > The driver may know something but not necessarily.
> > If the device validation to the key is failed, the driver will return
> > an error to the app.
> >
> Shouldn't this be a capability/feature flag whether it can be supported by the
> underlying Driver or not?

Makes sense to me.

> I am not saying that the driver should know the details of the wrapping mode.
> But it can be asked, whether it support this wrapping mode or not?

It can say that it support key wrapping - no more than that.

What do you think?


> 
> >
> > > >  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h | 7 +++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h
> > > > b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h
> > > > index 5973e31..6aca2c7 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h
> > > > +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h
> > > > @@ -200,6 +200,13 @@ struct rte_crypto_cipher_xform {
> > > >               uint16_t length;        /**< key length in bytes */
> > > >       } key;
> > > >       /**< Cipher key
> > > > +      * The original key data may be provided wrapped (encrypted)
> > > > + using
> > > > a key
> > > > +      * wrap algorithm such as AES key wrap (from rfc3394) or other.
> > > > + In
> > > > such
> > > > +      * case, the wrapping details is a secret between the key provider and
> > > > +      * the device. Such key wrapping may increase the length of
> > > > + the
> > > > provided
> > > > +      * key beyond the advertised supported key size. Hence it is the
> > > > +      * responsibility of the driver/device to validate the length of the
> > > > +      * provided key.
> > > >        *
> > > >        * For the RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_F8 mode of operation,
> > > > key.data will
> > > >        * point to a concatenation of the AES encryption key
> > > > followed by a
> > > > --
> > > > 1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-05 19:11 Akhil Goyal
2021-04-06  6:20 ` Matan Azrad
2021-04-06  8:08   ` Akhil Goyal
2021-04-06 10:49     ` Matan Azrad [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-16  6:51 Matan Azrad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW2PR12MB249231ECD7FB2A2BF328FFEBDF769@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=asomalap@amd.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.griffin@intel.com \
    --cc=michaelsh@marvell.com \
    --cc=oren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=sashakot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shirik@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).