From: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
To: David Bouyeure <david.bouyeure@fraudbuster.mobi>,
Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jack Min <jackmin@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_flow ageing
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:52:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR12MB2492E528FFB47182F1C58B89DF749@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8c77b2a-d9db-991a-4270-15e0ca0bd379@fraudbuster.mobi>
Yes, you right for the meaning of MLX5_AGE_TRIGGER.
But why you said it is erased when the callback return?
It is erased when a new aged-out flow is detected by the driver….
Do you have an issue with option 1?
Matan
From: David Bouyeure <david.bouyeure@fraudbuster.mobi>
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:50 AM
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Jack Min <jackmin@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_flow ageing
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Hi Matan,
below are my comments.
Thank you.
On 4/7/21 8:09 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
Yes you can call it from the event callback.
Sure, but it won't trigger the event callback as it would for the next aged-out flow(s) if called from outside the callback.
Yes, MLX5_AGE_TRIGGER probably means that event was sent and no need to send it again in the next aged-out flow.
I don't think so. MLX5_AGE_TRIGGER means 'Do call the callback for next aged-out flow(s)'.
Erasing it cause new event to be sent in the next aged-out flow...
No, I think it's the reverse.
I don't understand what is the issue for you in option 1...
השג את Outlook עבור Android<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7Cmatan%40nvidia.com%7C5f8447e5e9a0419d028408d8fa62f35c%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637534650206068346%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vfiLHcxWtpQEh9jqE7wIsGhs%2FZlMN5r4aJtSrvE7OgY%3D&reserved=0>
________________________________
From: David Bouyeure <david.bouyeure@fraudbuster.mobi><mailto:david.bouyeure@fraudbuster.mobi>
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 7:19:34 PM
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com><mailto:matan@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com><mailto:asafp@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <dev@dpdk.org><mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jack Min <jackmin@nvidia.com><mailto:jackmin@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_flow ageing
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Hi Matan, and thanks a lot,
regarding the mode 1, I still have a doubt:
1. Register the AGE event -> in event time to query the aged-out flows by the rte_flow_get_aged_flows API, this call will trigger a new event when new aged-out flow will be detected for the port.(if you don’t call rte_flow_get_aged_flows the event will not be retriggered.)
You meant calling rte_flow_get_aged_flows() from the event callback I guess...?
I think this is not working because MLX5_AGE_TRIGGER is erased when the callback returns.
Anyway, the polling mode is enough to me so far.
Thanks again.
Regards.
On 4/5/21 12:23 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
-->
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 8:34 David Bouyeure
2021-03-29 18:02 ` Asaf Penso
2021-03-30 15:45 ` David Bouyeure
2021-04-05 10:23 ` Matan Azrad
2021-04-07 16:19 ` David Bouyeure
2021-04-07 18:09 ` Matan Azrad
2021-04-08 7:50 ` David Bouyeure
2021-04-08 9:52 ` Matan Azrad [this message]
2021-04-08 16:45 ` David Bouyeure
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 10:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] support GTPU inner IPv4/IPv6 for AVF FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-03-29 7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] rte_flow ageing David Bouyeure
2021-03-29 8:32 ` David Bouyeure
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR12MB2492E528FFB47182F1C58B89DF749@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.bouyeure@fraudbuster.mobi \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jackmin@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).