From: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com>
To: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] test/reorder: add cases to cover new API
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:43:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR18MB2282FEDB7A674F4A91ACA7E4A8C59@MW2PR18MB2282.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120102146.4035460-4-vfialko@marvell.com>
Depends-on: series-26425 ("lib/reorder: fix drain/free issues")
Test failure is caused by this bug in drain/api test - http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=26425
It wasn't seen before seen before because drain was the last test, but now following test receive pointer to same packet twice due to double free.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 11:22 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>;
> Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] test/reorder: add cases to cover new API
>
> Add new test cases to cover `rte_reorder_drain_up_to_seqn` and `rte_reorder_min_seqn_set`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_reorder.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 160 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_reorder.c b/app/test/test_reorder.c index f0714a5c18..c345a72e0c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_reorder.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_reorder.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,164 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void
> +buffer_to_reorder_move(struct rte_mbuf **mbuf, struct
> +rte_reorder_buffer *b) {
> + rte_reorder_insert(b, *mbuf);
> + *mbuf = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +test_reorder_drain_up_to_seqn(void)
> +{
> + struct rte_mempool *p = test_params->p;
> + struct rte_reorder_buffer *b = NULL;
> + const unsigned int num_bufs = 10;
> + const unsigned int size = 4;
> + unsigned int i, cnt;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + struct rte_mbuf *bufs[num_bufs];
> + struct rte_mbuf *robufs[num_bufs];
> +
> + /* initialize all robufs to NULL */
> + memset(robufs, 0, sizeof(robufs));
> +
> + /* This would create a reorder buffer instance consisting of:
> + * reorder_seq = 0
> + * ready_buf: RB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + * order_buf: OB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + */
> + b = rte_reorder_create("test_drain_up_to_seqn", rte_socket_id(), size);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(b, "Failed to create reorder buffer");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) {
> + bufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(p);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(bufs[i], "Packet allocation failed\n");
> + *rte_reorder_seqn(bufs[i]) = i;
> + }
> +
> + /* Insert packet with seqn 1 and 3:
> + * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + * OB[] = {1, 2, 3, NULL}
> + */
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[1], b);
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[2], b);
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[3], b);
> + /* Draining 1, 2 */
> + cnt = rte_reorder_drain_up_to_seqn(b, robufs, num_bufs, 3);
> + if (cnt != 2) {
> + printf("%s:%d:%d: number of expected packets not drained\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__, cnt);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(robufs[i]);
> + memset(robufs, 0, sizeof(robufs));
> +
> + /* Insert more packets
> + * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + * OB[] = {3, 4, NULL, 6}
> + */
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[4], b);
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[6], b);
> + /* Insert more packets to utilize Ready buffer
> + * RB[] = {3, NULL, 5, 6}
> + * OB[] = {NULL, NULL, 8, NULL}
> + */
> + buffer_to_reorder_move(&bufs[8], b);
> +
> + /* Drain 3 and 5 */
> + cnt = rte_reorder_drain_up_to_seqn(b, robufs, num_bufs, 6);
> + if (cnt != 2) {
> + printf("%s:%d:%d: number of expected packets not drained\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__, cnt);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(robufs[i]);
> + memset(robufs, 0, sizeof(robufs));
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +exit:
> + rte_reorder_free(b);
> + for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) {
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(bufs[i]);
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(robufs[i]);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +test_reorder_set_seqn(void)
> +{
> + struct rte_mempool *p = test_params->p;
> + struct rte_reorder_buffer *b = NULL;
> + const unsigned int num_bufs = 7;
> + const unsigned int size = 4;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + struct rte_mbuf *bufs[num_bufs];
> +
> + /* This would create a reorder buffer instance consisting of:
> + * reorder_seq = 0
> + * ready_buf: RB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + * order_buf: OB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> + */
> + b = rte_reorder_create("test_min_seqn_set", rte_socket_id(), size);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(b, "Failed to create reorder buffer");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) {
> + bufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(p);
> + if (bufs[i] == NULL) {
> + printf("Packet allocation failed\n");
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + *rte_reorder_seqn(bufs[i]) = i;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rte_reorder_min_seqn_set(b, 5);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("%s:%d: Error in setting min sequence number\n", __func__, __LINE__);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[0]);
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + printf("%s:%d: Insertion with value less the min seq number\n", __func__, __LINE__);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[5]);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("%s:%d: Error inserting packet with valid seqn\n", __func__, __LINE__);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + bufs[5] = NULL;
> +
> + ret = rte_reorder_min_seqn_set(b, 0);
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + printf("%s:%d: Error in setting min sequence number with non-empty buffer\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +exit:
> + rte_reorder_free(b);
> + for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(bufs[i]);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int
> test_setup(void)
> {
> @@ -385,6 +543,8 @@ static struct unit_test_suite reorder_test_suite = {
> TEST_CASE(test_reorder_free),
> TEST_CASE(test_reorder_insert),
> TEST_CASE(test_reorder_drain),
> + TEST_CASE(test_reorder_drain_up_to_seqn),
> + TEST_CASE(test_reorder_set_seqn),
> TEST_CASES_END()
> }
> };
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 10:21 [PATCH 0/3] reorder: introduce new APIs Volodymyr Fialko
2023-01-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] reorder: add new drain up to seq number API Volodymyr Fialko
2023-02-19 23:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] reorder: add ability to set min sequence number Volodymyr Fialko
2023-01-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] test/reorder: add cases to cover new API Volodymyr Fialko
2023-01-20 12:43 ` Volodymyr Fialko [this message]
2023-02-19 23:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-26 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] reorder: introduce new APIs David Marchand
2023-02-20 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Volodymyr Fialko
2023-02-20 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] reorder: add new drain up to seq number API Volodymyr Fialko
2023-02-20 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] reorder: add ability to set min sequence number Volodymyr Fialko
2023-02-20 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] reorder: introduce new APIs Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-20 15:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR18MB2282FEDB7A674F4A91ACA7E4A8C59@MW2PR18MB2282.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=vfialko@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).