From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"nipun.gupta@nxp.com" <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>,
"sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com" <sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"erik.g.carrillo@intel.com" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
"jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>,
Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"harry.van.haaren@intel.com" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce modification in eventdev structure
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:18:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR18MB22842FEC3EBEC5683EDBE31BD85B9@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <347ace77-7704-5ac4-7dd9-0cabe88dfce0@ashroe.eu>
Hi Ray,
> > @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ Deprecation Notices
> > values to the function ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add`` using
> > the structure ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add``.
> >
> > +* eventdev: The function pointer ``ca_enqueue`` in structure
> ``rte_eventdev``
> > + will be moved after ``txa_enqueue`` so that all enqueue/dequeue
> > + function pointers are adjacent to each other.
> > +
> > * sched: To allow more traffic classes, flexible mapping of pipe queues to
> > traffic classes, and subport level configuration of pipes and queues
> > changes will be made to macros, data structures and API functions
> defined
> >
>
> I admire the disipline - but since you are not actually removing ca_enqueue,
> just moving it in memory when the new ABI is declared in anycase, this is not
> required.
>
Does it mean we can move elements in a structure without giving deprecation notice?
-akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-03 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 9:08 [dpdk-dev] " gakhil
2021-04-18 9:11 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-23 10:53 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-05-03 11:18 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-05-04 9:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-05-07 9:17 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR18MB22842FEC3EBEC5683EDBE31BD85B9@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sthotton@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).