From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"aconole@redhat.com" <aconole@redhat.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:00:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR18MB228438F3BB20CAAB675A4717D8529@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17245202.EenqpPWYet@thomas>
> I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not definitive.
> Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2?
> What is the intent?
>
The case is not failing in my testing. Neither it is reproducible at Ciara's end.
Ciara has asked to rerun the CI to check if it is false positive.
I don't want to defer this series as it passes all test except the CI and has been
Reviewed by multiple people.
I am merging this patch for RC2. If there is any issue, it can be fixed in RC3
Regards,
Akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 11:36 [dpdk-dev] " Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] app/test: refactor of unit test suite runner Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test: introduce parent testsuite format Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/crypto: refactor to use sub-testsuites Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/crypto: replace unsupported with skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/crypto: move testsuite params to header file Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite Ciara Power
2021-05-12 13:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework Akhil Goyal
2021-05-12 15:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-12 16:00 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-05-12 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-12 16:06 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-05-13 13:28 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR18MB228438F3BB20CAAB675A4717D8529@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).