DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"aconole@redhat.com" <aconole@redhat.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
	"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 13:15:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR18MB2284B2DCD4FB8BEFEA8AE9B1D8529@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512113655.568814-1-ciara.power@intel.com>

Hi Ciara,

I see that CI is reporting one error in autotest. Can you please check if it is because of your patchset?

9/96 DPDK:fast-tests / cycles_autotest                FAIL            1.42s   (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
12:33:15 DPDK_TEST=cycles_autotest MALLOC_PERTURB_=44 /home/jenkins-local/jenkins-agent/workspace/Ubuntu18.04-Unit-Test-DPDK/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test '-l 0-3' --file-prefix=cycles_autotest
----------------------------------- output -----------------------------------
stdout:
RTE>>cycles_autotest

delay_us is not accurate: too long
Test Failed


Regards,
Akhil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 5:07 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com; Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>;
> aconole@redhat.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Anoob Joseph
> <anoobj@marvell.com>; ruifeng.wang@arm.com; asomalap@amd.com;
> ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com; g.singh@nxp.com; roy.fan.zhang@intel.com;
> Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The current crypto unit test framework is not granular enough to
> accurately track unit test results. This is caused by one testcase
> in a suite actually running multiple testcases, but only returning
> one result.
> 
> The approach taken in this patchset allows a test suite have a
> list of sub-testsuites, and/or a list of testcases as previously used.
> The unit test suite runner can then recursively iterate and run the
> sub-testsuites, until it reaches a suite with testcases,
> and it then runs each testcase as it had done previously.
> In the case of a testsuite with both testcases and sub-testsuites,
> the testcases are executed first before iterating through the
> sub-testsuites.
> 
> By allowing this further breakdown into sub-testsuites,
> a refactor of the crypto unit tests solves the issue of inaccurate
> reporting, as sub-testsuites can be used in place of the testcases
> that had multiple testcases hidden on a sub level.
> The blockcipher tests previously had these hidden testcases,
> but are now sub-testsuites that are dynamically created and added to a
> parent test suite, allowing for each testcase status to be reported
> directly to the runner.
> The cryptodev test suite is broken down into smaller suites that are
> used as sub-testsuites, which allows for more flexibility choosing which
> sub-testsuites should run for the current device.
> The introduction of sub-testsuites also allows for more precise
> setup/teardown functions, that can check the capabilities required to
> run its testcases.
> 
> For example, when running the cryptodev_aesni_mb_autotest,
> the parent Cryptodev Test Suite is executed.
> Various sub-testsuites are added to the parent test suite, such as
> the static suites of testcases that were once in the cryptodev_testsuite,
> and blockcipher suites.
> The unit test runner can then run the Cryptodev parent test suite,
> which in turn will run the sub-testsuites.
> 
> The user is now required to create vdevs via EAL commandline args,
> this is no longer done within the test app for crypto autotests.
> 
> Documentation will need to be added at a later stage,
> adding to the test document that isn't yet merged. [1]
> 
> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__patchwork.dpdk.org_project_dpdk_patch_20210309155757.615536-
> 2D1-2Daconole-
> 40redhat.com_&d=DwIDAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=DnL7Si2wl_PR
> wpZ9TWey3eu68gBzn7DkPwuqhd6WNyo&m=XItKx7UnOATOiVC3kRLlV3Woh
> rLeZbmlqShu_py452U&s=BpOMigsNnvWMV739-
> fMxEvVERJieNSnfnnmZdiMLMJg&e=
> 
> 
> v4:
>   - Fixed some return value bugs related to patch 4.
>   - Rebased onto main.
> v3:
>   - Added support for a testsuite having both a list of testcases,
>     and a list of sub-testsuites.
>   - Replaced PMD based parent testsuites with a cryptodev testsuite
>     used by all autotests, with the exception of scheduler autotest.
>   - Setup functions were added for all sub-testsuites, within which
>     required capability support is checked.
>   - The setup functions no longer create vdevs if needed,
>     this must be done by the user when running the test.
>   - Patch added to standardise return values for skipped testcases.
> v2:
>   - Added macro in place of testcase/testsuite loops.
>   - Added more detail in the summary output.
>   - Moved testcase counts to the testsuite structure.
>   - Flattened testsuite structure to remove union.
>   - Added patch for fix of blockcipher test return value.
>   - Squashed release note into last patch.
> 
> Ciara Power (7):
>   app/test: refactor of unit test suite runner
>   test: introduce parent testsuite format
>   test/crypto: refactor to use sub-testsuites
>   test/crypto: replace unsupported with skipped
>   test/crypto: move testsuite params to header file
>   test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped
>   test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite
> 
>  app/test/test.c                        |  176 +-
>  app/test/test.h                        |   23 +-
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c              | 2333 ++++++++++++++----------
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.h              |   32 +
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c         |  111 +-
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c  |  423 ++++-
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.h  |   12 +-
>  app/test/test_ipsec.c                  |   32 +-
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst |    5 +
>  9 files changed, 2004 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12 11:36 [dpdk-dev] " Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] app/test: refactor of unit test suite runner Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test: introduce parent testsuite format Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/crypto: refactor to use sub-testsuites Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/crypto: replace unsupported with skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/crypto: move testsuite params to header file Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped Ciara Power
2021-05-12 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite Ciara Power
2021-05-12 13:15 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-05-12 15:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-12 16:00     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-05-12 16:05       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-12 16:06         ` Akhil Goyal
2021-05-13 13:28   ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW2PR18MB2284B2DCD4FB8BEFEA8AE9B1D8529@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=asomalap@amd.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).