From: "Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
To: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: "Jayatheerthan, Jay" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>,
"Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] eventdev/crypto: restore opaque field between dequeue and enqueue
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 13:37:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB59113B7076B94362F5657B8387FA2@MW4PR11MB5911.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB5832D6BA121EE495B36C51EFE8FA2@PH0PR11MB5832.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Abhi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 5:47 PM
> To: Kundapura, Ganapati <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> jerinj@marvell.com
> Cc: Jayatheerthan, Jay <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>; Naga Harish K, S V
> <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] eventdev/crypto: restore opaque field between
> dequeue and enqueue
>
> Hi Ganapati,
>
> Few comments inline. Please update in the next patch and add Acked-by:
> Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
>
Added Acked-by in v4
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kundapura, Ganapati <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 5:17 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> > <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jayatheerthan, Jay <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>; Naga Harish K, S
> > V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] eventdev/crypto: restore opaque field between
> > dequeue and enqueue
> >
> > For session-less crypto operations, event info is contained in crypto
> > op metadata for each event which is restored in event from the crypto
> > op metadata response info.
> >
> > For session based crypto operations, crypto op contains per session
> > based event info in crypto op metadata. If any PMD passes any
> > implementation specific data in ev::impl_opaque on each event, it's not
> getting restored.
> >
> > This patch stores ev::impl_opaque in mbuf's dynamic field before
> > enqueueing to cryptodev and restores ev::impl_opaque from mbuf's
> > dynamic field after dequeueing crypto op from cryptodev for session
> > based crypto operations.
> >
> > Fixes: 7901eac3409a ("eventdev: add crypto adapter implementation")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v3:
> > * Added Fixes tag
> >
> > v2:
> > * Fixed TYPO_SPELLING warning in commit header
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
> > b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
> > index db1c7f3..91a30ca 100644
> > --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
> > +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_crypto_adapter.c
> > @@ -138,6 +138,27 @@ static struct event_crypto_adapter
> > **event_crypto_adapter;
> > } \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > +#define ECA_DYNFIELD_NAME "eca_ev_opaque_data"
> > +/** Device-specific metadata field type */ typedef uint8_t
> > +eca_dynfield_t;
> > +/** Dynamic mbuf field for device-specific metadata */ int
> Offset of dynamic field, right?
> I see comment and statement are on the same line, please check.
Updated in V4
>
> > +eca_dynfield_offset = -1;
> > +
> > +static int
> > +eca_dynfield_register(void)
> > +{
> > + static const struct rte_mbuf_dynfield eca_dynfield_desc = {
> > + .name = ECA_DYNFIELD_NAME,
> > + .size = sizeof(eca_dynfield_t),
> > + .align = alignof(eca_dynfield_t),
> > + .flags = 0,
> > + };
> > +
> > + eca_dynfield_offset =
> > + rte_mbuf_dynfield_register(&eca_dynfield_desc);
> > + return eca_dynfield_offset;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int
> > eca_valid_id(uint8_t id)
> > {
> > @@ -491,6 +512,24 @@ eca_enq_to_cryptodev(struct
> event_crypto_adapter
> > *adapter, struct rte_event *ev,
> > crypto_op = ev[i].event_ptr;
> > if (crypto_op == NULL)
> > continue;
> > +
> > + /** ev::impl_opaque field passed on from eventdev PMD
> Replace ev::impl_opaque with "struct rte_event::impl_opaque " in commit
> message and code
>
Updated in v4
> > could
> > + * have different value per event.
> > + * For session-based crypto operations retain
> > ev::impl_opaque
> > + * into mbuf dynfield and restore it back after copying event
> > + * information from session event metadata.
> > + * For session-less, each crypto operation carries event
> > + * metadata and retains ev::impl_opaque information to be
> > + * passed back to eventdev PMD.
> > + */
> > + if (crypto_op->sess_type ==
> RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION)
> > {
> > + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = crypto_op->sym->m_src;
> > +
> > + *RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD(mbuf,
> > + eca_dynfield_offset,
> > + eca_dynfield_t *) =
> > ev[i].impl_opaque;
> > + }
> > +
> > m_data =
> > rte_cryptodev_session_event_mdata_get(crypto_op);
> > if (m_data == NULL) {
> > rte_pktmbuf_free(crypto_op->sym->m_src);
> > @@ -657,6 +696,21 @@ eca_ops_enqueue_burst(struct
> event_crypto_adapter
> > *adapter,
> >
> > rte_memcpy(ev, &m_data->response_info, sizeof(*ev));
> > ev->event_ptr = ops[i];
> > +
> > + /** restore ev::impl_opaque from mbuf dyn field
> Replace dynfield -> "dynamic field" in the comments
Updated in v4
> > + * for session based crypto operation.
> > + * For session-less, each crypto operations carries event
> > + * metadata and retains ev::impl_opaque information to be
> > + * passed back to eventdev PMD.
> > + */
> > + if (ops[i]->sess_type == RTE_CRYPTO_OP_WITH_SESSION) {
> > + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = ops[i]->sym->m_src;
> > +
> > + ev->impl_opaque = *RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD(mbuf,
> > + eca_dynfield_offset,
> > + eca_dynfield_t *);
> > + }
> > +
> > ev->event_type = RTE_EVENT_TYPE_CRYPTODEV;
> > if (adapter->implicit_release_disabled)
> > ev->op = RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD;
> > @@ -895,6 +949,16 @@ eca_init_service(struct event_crypto_adapter
> > *adapter, uint8_t id)
> > }
> >
> > adapter->implicit_release_disabled = (uint8_t)impl_rel;
> > +
> > + /* Register for mbuf dyn field to store/restore ev::impl_opaque */
> > + eca_dynfield_offset = eca_dynfield_register();
> > + if (eca_dynfield_offset < 0) {
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Failed to register eca mbuf dyn field");
> > + eca_circular_buffer_free(&adapter->ebuf);
> > + rte_free(adapter);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > adapter->service_inited = 1;
> >
> > return ret;
> > --
> > 2.6.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 16:08 [PATCH v1] " Ganapati Kundapura
2024-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Ganapati Kundapura
2024-06-06 8:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-06-06 10:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-06-06 11:47 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-06-06 11:46 ` [PATCH v3] " Ganapati Kundapura
2024-06-06 12:17 ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2024-06-06 13:37 ` Kundapura, Ganapati [this message]
2024-06-06 13:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Ganapati Kundapura
2024-06-06 13:48 ` [PATCH v5] " Ganapati Kundapura
2024-06-07 8:20 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB59113B7076B94362F5657B8387FA2@MW4PR11MB5911.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ganapati.kundapura@intel.com \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).