From: "Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>,
"fanzhang.oss@gmail.com" <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v1] crypto: fix build issues on crypto callbacks macro undefined
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 09:57:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5911FD23CC8F4466522B92C387F22@MW4PR11MB5911.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB44846BAA0AE75E789078B73FD8F22@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 2:05 PM
> To: Kundapura, Ganapati <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>; thomas@monjalon.net; Richardson,
> Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>;
> ciara.power@intel.com; fanzhang.oss@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v1] crypto: fix build issues on crypto callbacks
> macro undefined
>
> > Crypto callbacks macro is defined with value 1 and being used with
> > ifdef, on config value is changed to 0 to disable, crypto callback
> > changes still being compiled.
>
> I believe we can use #if instead of ifdefs.
> It seems convenient to enable/disable in my opinion.
> We can use both, but whatever we use should be same as that for ethdev
> callbacks.
>
Using #if requires check for equality like
#if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS == 1 for a macro defined with value 1
> The same issue would be for ethdev callbacks too.
> Ferruh, can you check?
>
> >
> > Defined crypto callbacks macro without value, undef to disable
> >
> > Wrapped crypto callback changes with RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS macro to fix
> > build issues when macro is undefined.
> >
> > As callback head nodes have valid pointer, this patch checks the next
> > node from the head if callbacks registered.
> >
> > Fixes: 1c3ffb9 ("cryptodev: add enqueue and dequeue callbacks")
> > Fixes: 5523a75 ("test/crypto: add case for enqueue/dequeue callbacks")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
>
>
> > diff --git a/config/rte_config.h b/config/rte_config.h index
> > dd7bb0d35b..b647a69ba8 100644
> > --- a/config/rte_config.h
> > +++ b/config/rte_config.h
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> > /* cryptodev defines */
> > #define RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS 64
> > #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_LEN 64
> > -#define RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS 1
> > +#define RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS /* No Value, undef/comment out to
> > disable */
> >
> > /* compressdev defines */
> > #define RTE_COMPRESS_MAX_DEVS 64
>
>
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h index 00ba6a234a..b811b458d5 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > @@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(uint8_t dev_id,
> > uint16_t qp_id,
> > nb_ops = fp_ops->dequeue_burst(qp, ops, nb_ops);
> >
> > #ifdef RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
> > - if (unlikely(fp_ops->qp.deq_cb != NULL)) {
> > + if (unlikely(fp_ops->qp.deq_cb[qp_id].next != NULL)) {
> > struct rte_cryptodev_cb_rcu *list;
> > struct rte_cryptodev_cb *cb;
> >
> > @@ -1977,7 +1977,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(uint8_t dev_id,
> > uint16_t qp_id,
> > fp_ops = &rte_crypto_fp_ops[dev_id];
> > qp = fp_ops->qp.data[qp_id];
> > #ifdef RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
> > - if (unlikely(fp_ops->qp.enq_cb != NULL)) {
> > + if (unlikely(fp_ops->qp.enq_cb[qp_id].next != NULL)) {
> > struct rte_cryptodev_cb_rcu *list;
> > struct rte_cryptodev_cb *cb;
> >
> This is a separate issue. Please create a separate patch.
ok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-16 8:12 Ganapati Kundapura
2024-04-16 9:16 ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2024-04-17 11:40 ` Power, Ciara
2024-05-22 8:51 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-22 8:55 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-22 13:51 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-22 14:45 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-22 18:36 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-23 8:54 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-29 8:35 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-05-29 9:57 ` Kundapura, Ganapati [this message]
2024-05-29 11:40 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-29 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto callbacks macro Ganapati Kundapura
2024-05-29 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: validate crypto callbacks from next node Ganapati Kundapura
2024-05-30 8:13 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 8:12 ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto callbacks macro Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 11:01 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 11:13 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 11:41 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 11:45 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 11:40 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 11:46 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 11:52 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 14:22 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 14:49 ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-06 9:44 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-06-13 18:03 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-06-20 14:34 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5911FD23CC8F4466522B92C387F22@MW4PR11MB5911.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ganapati.kundapura@intel.com \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).