From: "Xu, HailinX" <hailinx.xu@intel.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>,
Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
"Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"Stokes, Ian" <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>,
"Luca Boccassi" <bluca@debian.org>,
Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"yanghliu@redhat.com" <yanghliu@redhat.com>,
"Peng, Yuan" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:40:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5912272F62D812C77019668A9F639@MW4PR11MB5912.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR11MB591265E82C9543E2C2EA54059F989@MW4PR11MB5912.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, HailinX <hailinx.xu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM
> To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian
> <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Luca
> Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas
> Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan
> <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM
> > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> > <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> > Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
> > <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca
> > Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian
> > Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> Thomas
> > Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan
> > <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4.
> >
> > The planned date for the final release is 25th April.
> >
> > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> >
> > A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> >
> > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1
> >
> > These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Kevin
>
> HI All,
>
> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 validation test
> rate is 85%. No critical issue is found.
> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev.
> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues
> 1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac:
> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet
> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under investigating
> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest
> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as
> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4,
> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible
> Descriptor, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single
> core performance test, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test -
> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> - On going.
>
> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
> - All test done. found bug1.
> * Cryptodev:
> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev
> ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2.
> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput
> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
>
> Regards,
> Xu, Hailin
Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 all validation. No critical issue is found.
2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev.
New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues
1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only the specified platform exists
2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under investigating
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as
Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
- All test done. found bug1.
* Cryptodev:
*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
- All test done. found bug2.
*Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
Regards,
Xu, Hailin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 11:37 Kevin Traynor
2023-04-13 6:12 ` Xu, HailinX
2023-04-19 11:00 ` YangHang Liu
2023-04-20 2:40 ` Xu, HailinX [this message]
2023-04-20 10:32 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-05-02 9:35 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-05-04 2:13 ` Xu, HailinX
2023-05-04 10:10 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-05-05 1:42 ` Xu, HailinX
2023-05-08 15:23 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-05-11 7:33 ` Jiang, YuX
2023-05-16 8:41 ` Kevin Traynor
2023-04-19 13:24 ` Ali Alnubani
2023-04-19 14:21 ` Kevin Traynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB5912272F62D812C77019668A9F639@MW4PR11MB5912.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=hailinx.xu@intel.com \
--cc=Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=juhlee@microsoft.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yanghliu@redhat.com \
--cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
--cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).