DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: Cody Harris <codh@amazon.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/ixgbe: include QPRDC in imissed stat
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 03:53:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1391D9B90C6FCFB0D1E9EEC2B78E0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519050807.21730-1-codh@amazon.com>

HI,Cody Harris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Cody Harris
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Cody Harris <codh@amazon.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/ixgbe: include QPRDC in imissed stat
> 
> The ixgbe imissed statstic originally only contained dropped packets counted by
> the RXMPC registers. This change includes additional types of packet drops
> counted by the QPRDC registers.
> 
> Intel support confimed that the packet drops counted by the QPRDC registers
> do not double-count drops counted by RXMPC registers:
> 
> "RXMPC counts packets that are dropped because there is no room in the
> internal packet buffer.  QPRDC counts packets that are dropped because they
> can't be transferred to system memory. These packets have been stored in the
> internal packet buffer, so there should be no overlap with RXMPC."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cody Harris <codh@amazon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index a4e5c539d..7284ca28e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -3366,7 +3366,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_stats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct rte_eth_stats *stats)
>  	}
> 
>  	/* Rx Errors */
> -	stats->imissed  = total_missed_rx;
> +	stats->imissed  = total_missed_rx + total_qprdc;

If Rx queue is disabled in the RXDCTL register, packet direct to this queue is also dropped and count by this 
Register QPRDC, but the definition of imissed is "Total of RX packets dropped by the HW because there are no available buffer" in rte layer.
So, it maybe mislead users if we mix the 2 statistic, is that so?
Also, x550 has other definition for this register, we can not mix them.


>  	stats->ierrors  = hw_stats->crcerrs +
>  			  hw_stats->mspdc +
>  			  hw_stats->rlec +
> --
> 2.24.1.AMZN


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <pw70410>
2020-05-19  5:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] include dropped packets from QPRDC in ixbe imissed Cody Harris
2020-05-19  5:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/ixgbe: include QPRDC in imissed stat Cody Harris
2020-05-19  5:09   ` Harris, Cody
2020-05-28  3:53   ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2020-05-28  8:09     ` Zhao1, Wei
2020-05-28  8:17       ` Harris, Cody
2020-05-28  9:43         ` Zhao1, Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1391D9B90C6FCFB0D1E9EEC2B78E0@MWHPR11MB1391.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    --cc=codh@amazon.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).