From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111943195 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:00:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id ABB70A626E77FAFC3EB0; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:00:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id v8E9vbTv095324; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:57:37 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.yong19@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <89a345e1-43ba-2a2a-4cd2-55e2bad1817d@intel.com> References: <1505373770-24737-1-git-send-email-wang.yong19@zte.com.cn> <89a345e1-43ba-2a2a-4cd2-55e2bad1817d@intel.com> To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: 7E84BB99:450C64C3-4825819B:00369C74; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 Message-ID: From: wang.yong19@zte.com.cn Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:58:10 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 9.0.1FP7|August 17, 2016) at 2017-09-14 17:57:24, Serialize complete at 2017-09-14 17:57:24 X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn v8E9vbTv095324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmU6ICBbUEFUQ0hdIG5ldC9hcms6YWRk?= =?gb2312?b?IG51bGwgcG9pbnQgY2hlY2s=?= X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:00:43 -0000 > Ferruh Yigit > 2017/09/14 17:33 > > to > > Yong Wang , shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com, > > cc > > dev@dpdk.org > > subject > > Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ark:add null point check > > On 9/14/2017 8:22 AM, Yong Wang wrote: > > In function ark_config_device(), there are several malloc without null > > point check. Fix it by adding null point check. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wang > > Hi Yong, > > Thank you for the patch. > > I think you have sent new version of the patch because previous one was > giving checkpatch warning, but having two patches with same title is > being confusing. > > Next time would you mind sending next version as version 2 (v2) and as a > reply to previous version of the patch? So this makes clear which one is > the one to take into account. > Also adding a changelog to the commit log makes life easy. Thanks. > > DPDK Contributor's Guide has more details: > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html > > Thanks, > ferruh Ok. Thanks for your advice.