From: Chao CH Zhu <bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Cyril Chemparathy <cchemparathy@tilera.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:14:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OFAC58F6F8.97F451C4-ON48257D6F.0032AE99-48257D6F.0032E781@cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54330D9A.3080003@tilera.com>
Cyril,
Thanks for your comments! You are right. SSE needs to be splited. The
current split is not a completed one. I'll continue to contribute.
Best Regards!
------------------------------
Chao Zhu (祝超)
Research Staff Member
Cloud Infrastructure and Technology Group
IBM China Research Lab
Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park
8 Dongbeiwang West Road, Haidian District,
Beijing, PRC. 100193
Tel: +86-10-58748711
Email: bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com
From: Cyril Chemparathy <cchemparathy@tilera.com>
To: Chao CH Zhu/China/IBM@IBMCN, <dev@dpdk.org>
Date: 2014/10/07 05:39
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture
specific operations from DPDK
On 9/26/2014 2:33 AM, Chao Zhu wrote:
> The set of patches split x86 architecture specific operations from DPDK
and put them to the
> arch directories of i686 and x86_64 architecture. This will make the
adpotion of DPDK much easier
> on other computer architecture. For a new architecture, just add an
architecture specific
> directory and necessary building configuration files, then DPDK can
support it.
Wouldn't the SSE specifics in rte_common.h and rte_common_vect.h need to
be similarly split out into architecture specifics?
Thanks
-- Cyril.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-12 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 9:33 Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] Split atomic operations to architecture specific Chao Zhu
2014-09-29 11:05 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-09-29 15:24 ` Neil Horman
2014-09-30 2:18 ` Chao CH Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] Split byte order " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] Split CPU cycle operation " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] Split prefetch operations " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] Split spinlock " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] Split memcpy operation " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Split CPU flags operations " Chao Zhu
2014-10-03 13:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK David Marchand
2014-10-03 13:29 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-13 2:36 ` Chao CH Zhu
2014-10-06 21:46 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2014-10-12 9:14 ` Chao CH Zhu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OFAC58F6F8.97F451C4-ON48257D6F.0032AE99-48257D6F.0032E781@cn.ibm.com \
--to=bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=cchemparathy@tilera.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).