DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao CH Zhu <bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Cyril Chemparathy <cchemparathy@tilera.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:14:37 +0800
Message-ID: <OFAC58F6F8.97F451C4-ON48257D6F.0032AE99-48257D6F.0032E781@cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54330D9A.3080003@tilera.com>


Thanks for your comments! You are right. SSE needs to be splited. The 
current split is not a completed one. I'll continue to contribute.

Best Regards!
Chao Zhu (祝超)
Research Staff Member
Cloud Infrastructure and Technology Group
IBM China Research Lab
Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park
8 Dongbeiwang West Road, Haidian District,
Beijing, PRC. 100193
Tel: +86-10-58748711
Email: bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com

From:   Cyril Chemparathy <cchemparathy@tilera.com>
To:     Chao CH Zhu/China/IBM@IBMCN, <dev@dpdk.org>
Date:   2014/10/07 05:39
Subject:        Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture 
specific operations from DPDK

On 9/26/2014 2:33 AM, Chao Zhu wrote:
> The set of patches split x86 architecture specific operations from DPDK 
and put them to the
> arch directories of i686 and x86_64 architecture. This will make the 
adpotion of DPDK much easier
> on other computer architecture. For a new architecture, just add an 
architecture specific
> directory and necessary building configuration files, then DPDK can 
support it.

Wouldn't the SSE specifics in rte_common.h and rte_common_vect.h need to 
be similarly split out into architecture specifics?

-- Cyril.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-10-12  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-26  9:33 Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] Split atomic operations to architecture specific Chao Zhu
2014-09-29 11:05   ` Bruce Richardson
2014-09-29 15:24     ` Neil Horman
2014-09-30  2:18       ` Chao CH Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] Split byte order " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] Split CPU cycle operation " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] Split prefetch operations " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] Split spinlock " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] Split memcpy operation " Chao Zhu
2014-09-26  9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Split CPU flags operations " Chao Zhu
2014-10-03 13:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Patches to split architecture specific operations from DPDK David Marchand
2014-10-03 13:29   ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-13  2:36   ` Chao CH Zhu
2014-10-06 21:46 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2014-10-12  9:14   ` Chao CH Zhu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OFAC58F6F8.97F451C4-ON48257D6F.0032AE99-48257D6F.0032E781@cn.ibm.com \
    --to=bjzhuc@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=cchemparathy@tilera.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git