From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from inblrg01.tcs.com (inblrg01.tcs.com [121.242.48.3]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21210592E for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:58:24 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,731,1400005800"; d="scan'208";a="115698188" Received: from INBLRDLPMTA2.india.tcs.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by INBLRDLPMTA2.india.tcs.com (Service) with ESMTP id 3EE52128E12 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:29:57 +0530 (IST) Received: from InHydM02.tcs.com (unknown [172.25.68.72]) by INBLRDLPMTA2.india.tcs.com (Service) with ESMTP id D4023128E02 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:29:55 +0530 (IST) Sensitivity: MIME-Version: 1.0 Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: References: From: Santhosh Bendalam To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:29:53 +0530 X-Mailer: Lotus Domino Web Server Release 8.5.3FP2 July 02, 2012 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Notes Server on InHydM02/TCS(Release 8.5.3FP2|July 02, 2012) at 07/25/2014 20:29:53, Serialize complete at 07/25/2014 20:29:53, Itemize by Notes Server on InHydM02/TCS(Release 8.5.3FP2|July 02, 2012) at 07/25/2014 20:29:53, Serialize by Notes Server on InHydM02/TCS(Release 8.5.3FP2|July 02, 2012) at 07/25/2014 20:29:55, Serialize complete at 07/25/2014 20:29:55, Serialize by Router on InHydM02/TCS(Release 8.5.3FP2|July 02, 2012) at 07/25/2014 20:29:55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regarding new feature development in dpdk-acl X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:58:26 -0000 Hi All, I am trying to add new acl rule support to filter the packets based on TCP = flags. I have followed the structure updates as per DPDK Programmers guide.= I have attached the code diff along with this mail. Some how packet filtering is not happening with our modifications. = Input configuration file used is (Here we are trying to restrict SYN+FIN fl= ag) @20.0.0.0/24 40.0.0.0/24 0 : 65535 0 : 65535 6/0xfe 0x3/0xFF R20.0.0.0/24 40.0.0.0/24 0 : 65535 0 : 65535 6/0xfe 0x0/0x00 1 R40.0.0.0/24 20.0.0.0/24 0 : 65535 0 : 65535 6/0xfe 0x0/0x00 1 Could you please share your thoughts on this problem. Warm Regards, Santhosh Kumar Bendalam, Assistant Consultant, Tata Consultancy Services Limited =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-----=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-----=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain = confidential or privileged information. If you are = not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, = review, distribution, printing or copying of the = information contained in this e-mail message = and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If = you have received this communication in error, = please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and = immediately and permanently delete the message = and any attachments. Thank you