From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1.zte.com.cn (out1.zte.com.cn [202.103.147.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B864293B for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:38:44 +0100 (CET) X-MAILFROM: X-RCPTTO: X-FROMIP: 10.30.3.20 X-SEG-Scaned: 1 X-Received: unknown,10.30.3.20,20170206182652 Received: from unknown (HELO mse01.zte.com.cn) (10.30.3.20) by localhost with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Feb 2017 10:26:52 -0000 Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id v16AcUsG044222; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:38:30 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B560600@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1482285839-42805-1-git-send-email-yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B560600@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Helin" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: E57A50AB:37C4023D-482580BF:003A3731; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 Message-ID: From: yao.chenghu@zte.com.cn Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:38:42 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017-02-06 18:38:18, Serialize complete at 2017-02-06 18:38:18 X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn v16AcUsG044222 X-HQIP: 127.0.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUkU6IFtQQVRDSCB2Ml0gbmV0L2l4Z2Jl?= =?gb2312?b?L2Jhc2U6IGNsZWFyIHJlZHVuZGFudCBtYWNybyBkZWZpbmU=?= X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:38:46 -0000 > As 1.x is for linux/freebsd, but 2.0 is for solaris, 2.0 doesn't > leverage the messages from 1.x. For example, 0x0a has different > meaning in 1.x and 2.0. So better letting it be. > Ok, thanks for your reply.