From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Dooley, Brian" <brian.dooley@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:46:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB50137A4509F03F983F9426549F7E2@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB4484801F5DC65518889030ACD87E2@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 1:28 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Dooley, Brian <brian.dooley@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op
>
> > /**
> > - * Asymmetric crypto transform data
> > - *
> > - * Structure describing asym xforms.
> > - */
> > -struct rte_crypto_asym_xform {
> > - struct rte_crypto_asym_xform *next;
> > - /**< Pointer to next xform to set up xform chain.*/
> > - enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_type;
> > - /**< Asymmetric crypto transform */
> > -
> > - union {
> > - struct rte_crypto_rsa_xform rsa;
> > - /**< RSA xform parameters */
> > -
> > - struct rte_crypto_modex_xform modex;
> > - /**< Modular Exponentiation xform parameters */
> > -
> > - struct rte_crypto_modinv_xform modinv;
> > - /**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse xform parameters */
> > -
> > - struct rte_crypto_dh_xform dh;
> > - /**< DH xform parameters */
> > -
> > - struct rte_crypto_dsa_xform dsa;
> > - /**< DSA xform parameters */
> > -
> > - struct rte_crypto_ec_xform ec;
> > - /**< EC xform parameters, used by elliptic curve based
> > - * operations.
> > - */
> > - };
> > -};
> > -
> Above change seems redundant.
> It was commented on v2 as well.
My apologies, I have missed it.
The reason for this change was to keep a little bit better order in this file.
So previously we have had:
-defines
-enums
-algorithms xfroms
-algorithms ops
-asym xform
-asym op
now we got:
-defines
-enums
-algorithms xfroms
-algorithms ops
-asym xform
-------------SM2 OP
-asym op
I know it is not a game changer, but helps to keep a better order in this file.
If this is problematic then I can revert it.
>
>
> > -/**
> > * SM2 operation params.
> > */
> > struct rte_crypto_sm2_op_param {
> > @@ -658,20 +624,43 @@ struct rte_crypto_sm2_op_param {
> > * will be overwritten by the PMD with the decrypted length.
> > */
> >
> > - rte_crypto_param cipher;
> > - /**<
> > - * Pointer to input data
> > - * - to be decrypted for SM2 private decrypt.
> > - *
> > - * Pointer to output data
> > - * - for SM2 public encrypt.
> > - * In this case the underlying array should have been allocated
> > - * with enough memory to hold ciphertext output (at least X bytes
> > - * for prime field curve of N bytes and for message M bytes,
> > - * where X = (C1 || C2 || C3) and computed based on SM2 RFC as
> > - * C1 (1 + N + N), C2 = M, C3 = N. The cipher.length field will
> > - * be overwritten by the PMD with the encrypted length.
> > - */
> > + union {
> > + rte_crypto_param cipher;
> > + /**<
> > + * Pointer to input data
> > + * - to be decrypted for SM2 private decrypt.
> > + *
> > + * Pointer to output data
> > + * - for SM2 public encrypt.
> > + * In this case the underlying array should have been allocated
> > + * with enough memory to hold ciphertext output (at least X
> > bytes
> > + * for prime field curve of N bytes and for message M bytes,
> > + * where X = (C1 || C2 || C3) and computed based on SM2 RFC
> > as
> > + * C1 (1 + N + N), C2 = M, C3 = N. The cipher.length field will
> > + * be overwritten by the PMD with the encrypted length.
> > + */
> > + struct {
> > + struct rte_crypto_ec_point C1;
> > + /**<
> > + * This field is used only when PMD does not support
> the
> > full
> > + * process of the SM2 encryption/decryption, but the
> > elliptic
> > + * curve part only.
> > + *
> > + * In the case of encryption, it is an output - point C1 =
> > (x1,y1).
> > + * In the case of decryption, if is an input - point C1 =
> > (x1,y1)
> > + *
> > + */
> > + struct rte_crypto_ec_point kP;
> > + /**<
> > + * This field is used only when PMD does not support
> the
> > full
> > + * process of the SM2 encryption/decryption, but the
> > elliptic
> > + * curve part only.
> > + *
> > + * It is an output in the encryption case, it is a point
> > + * [k]P = (x2,y2)
> > + */
> > + };
> > + };
> You may add a reference to the newly added feature flag here.
+1
>
>
> >
> > rte_crypto_uint id;
> > /**< The SM2 id used by signer and verifier. */ @@ -698,6 +687,40 @@
> > struct rte_crypto_sm2_op_param { };
> >
> > /**
> > + * Asymmetric crypto transform data
> > + *
> > + * Structure describing asym xforms.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_crypto_asym_xform {
> > + struct rte_crypto_asym_xform *next;
> > + /**< Pointer to next xform to set up xform chain.*/
> > + enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type xform_type;
> > + /**< Asymmetric crypto transform */
> > +
> > + union {
> > + struct rte_crypto_rsa_xform rsa;
> > + /**< RSA xform parameters */
> > +
> > + struct rte_crypto_modex_xform modex;
> > + /**< Modular Exponentiation xform parameters */
> > +
> > + struct rte_crypto_modinv_xform modinv;
> > + /**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse xform parameters */
> > +
> > + struct rte_crypto_dh_xform dh;
> > + /**< DH xform parameters */
> > +
> > + struct rte_crypto_dsa_xform dsa;
> > + /**< DSA xform parameters */
> > +
> > + struct rte_crypto_ec_xform ec;
> > + /**< EC xform parameters, used by elliptic curve based
> > + * operations.
> > + */
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > * Asymmetric Cryptographic Operation.
> > *
> > * Structure describing asymmetric crypto operation params.
> > --
> > 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 18:59 [PATCH 1/3] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-01-29 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] crypto/qat: add sm2 encryption/decryption function Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-01-29 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] app/test: add test sm2 C1/Kp test cases Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-02-01 8:07 ` [EXT] [PATCH 1/3] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op Akhil Goyal
2024-02-01 13:25 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-09-24 16:30 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-09-29 17:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-01 7:57 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-03 14:39 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-10-07 8:29 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-08 6:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: add partial sm2 feature flag Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 6:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 11:27 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-08 11:46 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2024-10-08 11:49 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-10-08 6:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] crypto/qat: add sm2 encryption/decryption function Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 6:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] app/test: add test sm2 C1/Kp test cases Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 15:40 ` Dooley, Brian
2024-10-08 11:46 ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: add partial sm2 feature flag Akhil Goyal
2024-10-08 11:48 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] add ec points to sm2 op Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] cryptodev: reorder structures in asym crypto header Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 20:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-08 21:00 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-08 21:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-08 21:29 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] cryptodev: reorder structures in asym crypto header Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-09 21:03 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] cryptodev: add ec points to sm2 op Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-09 20:51 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-11 12:17 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-10-17 18:54 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-18 12:30 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-10-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] crypto/qat: add sm2 encryption/decryption function Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-09 20:49 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-10 7:49 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] app/test: add test sm2 C1/Kp test cases Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-11 12:16 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] crypto/qat: add sm2 encryption/decryption function Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] app/test: add test sm2 C1/Kp test cases Arkadiusz Kusztal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB50137A4509F03F983F9426549F7E2@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=brian.dooley@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).