From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>,
"Dooley, Brian" <brian.dooley@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] net: add thread-safe crc api
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:37:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5013C5B4CCD8AC10040F44EF9FF12@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207091242.07656c4c@hermes.local>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 6:13 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yigit@amd.com; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>; Dooley,
> Brian <brian.dooley@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: add thread-safe crc api
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:37:58 +0000
> Arkadiusz Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > +* net: A thread/process-safe API was introduced. Old and new APIs share the
> same
> > + function names, but the old one is versioned. Replaced functions are:
> > + ``rte_net_crc_calc`` and ``rte_net_crc_set_alg``. The new one is
> ``rte_net_crc_free``
>
> The first sentence should be more specific, and avoid passive voice.
> Follow the style of other release notes in other releases.
> Also, should indicate that versioning is short term (until 25.11).
>
> Something like:
>
> * **Changed the API for CRC calculation to be thread safe.**
But this was added under the `API changes` which states "* sample: Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the API change".
This header is from the `New Features`, so should I add it to the `New Features` then?
Otherwise I agree.
>
> An opaque context argument was introduced to the net CRC API containing
> the algorithim type and length. This argument is added to
> to ``rte_net_crc_calc``, ``rte_net_crc_set_alg`` and freed with
> ``rte_net_crc_free``.
> These functions are versioned to retain binary compatiabilty until the next LTS
> release.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 18:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-01 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-01 21:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-02 8:28 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-02 7:42 ` David Marchand
2024-10-02 8:41 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-02 9:01 ` David Marchand
2024-10-02 9:16 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-08 3:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-08 20:51 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-09 1:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-09 7:48 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-10-09 9:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2025-02-06 20:54 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2024-12-02 22:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-06 20:43 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2025-02-06 20:38 ` [PATCH v3] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2025-02-07 6:37 ` [PATCH v4] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2025-02-07 17:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-07 17:37 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2025-02-07 18:24 ` [PATCH v5] " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-01 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto/qat: use process safe " Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-10-01 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/crc: replace thread-unsafe api functions Arkadiusz Kusztal
2024-12-02 22:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5013C5B4CCD8AC10040F44EF9FF12@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=brian.dooley@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).