From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 02/12] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:08:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5013E51E05F0B532522FBB3D9FDC9@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB50134AEF92198E910FB586E49FDC9@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 3:50 PM
> To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 02/12] cryptodev: separate key exchange
> operation enum
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 1:47 PM
> > To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 02/12] cryptodev: separate key exchange
> > operation enum
> >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h index 2c2c2edeb7..7d683fd728 100644
> > > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> > > @@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ struct rte_cryptodev_asymmetric_xform_capability {
> > > /**< Transform type: RSA/MODEXP/DH/DSA/MODINV */
> > >
> > > uint32_t op_types;
> > > - /**< bitmask for supported rte_crypto_asym_op_type */
> > > + /**< bitmask for supported rte_crypto_asym_op_type or
> > > + * rte_crypto_asym_ke_type
> > > + */
> >
> > How is this supposed to work?
> > Ke_type and op_type are 2 separate enums which can have same value.
> > How will the user identify which one to use?
> [Arek] - by algorithm - xform_type.
> > Shouldn't we split this too?
> [Arek] - for me both options are ok. For some SM2 may be bit challenging here,
[Arek] - wanted to say here that I prefer not to split it.
> but in such situations we should have different op types for KE and OP. This
> would spare this API from having one op with majority of fields unused.
> Though it may be split too, not big problem.
>
> >
> > >
> > > __extension__
> > > union {
> > > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/version.map b/lib/cryptodev/version.map
> > > index f0abfaa47d..dbf1f62199 100644
> > > --- a/lib/cryptodev/version.map
> > > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/version.map
> > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > >
> > > #added in 22.07
> > > rte_cryptodev_session_event_mdata_set;
> > > + rte_crypto_asym_ke_strings;
> > > };
> > >
> > > INTERNAL {
> > > --
> > > 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-31 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-31 4:04 [PATCH v4 00/12] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:32 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 12:29 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:34 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 11:47 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 13:50 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-31 14:08 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2022-05-31 14:34 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:35 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:35 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:36 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:36 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 8:29 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:37 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:37 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 11:39 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] cryptodev: clarify usage of rsa padding hash Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:42 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:46 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] cryptodev: clarify rsa verify with none padding Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:47 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-31 7:48 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 7:49 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-31 11:52 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5013E51E05F0B532522FBB3D9FDC9@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).