From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: "Namburu, Chandu-babu" <chandu@amd.com>,
"835703180@qq.com" <835703180@qq.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] crypto/ccp: Check for the NULL pointer after calling rte_malloc
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:01:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB44912F8962FA2714C7B8896BD86B9@PH0PR18MB4491.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wSpHR-67uHDHgw8oAwsOs0HqyAA_okvgi5S_08PiNFfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Could you please reply to David and Stephen's comments?
Regards,
Akhil
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:29 AM Namburu, Chandu-babu <chandu@amd.com>
> wrote:
> > From: Shiqi Liu <835703180@qq.com>
> >
> > As the possible failure of the rte_malloc(), the not_checked and checked could
> be NULL pointer.
> > Therefore, it should be better to check it in order to avoid the dereference of
> the NULL pointer.
> >
> > Fixes: 09a0fd736a0 ("crypto/ccp: enable IOMMU")
> > Signed-off-by: Shiqi Liu <835703180@qq.com>
>
> This sha_ctx variable and its accesses are suspicious.
>
> It seems to be used as some kind of intermediate buffer, but I fail to
> see the need.
> Can't the existing code rely on sess->auth.ctx ?
>
> There is also a suspicious mention (in ccp_perform_sha) of sha_ctx but
> with no calling rte_mem_virt2iova().
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-09 11:01 835703180
2022-07-20 6:29 ` Namburu, Chandu-babu
2022-07-20 13:43 ` David Marchand
2022-08-16 16:01 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-08-23 6:14 ` [EXT] " Namburu, Chandu-babu
2022-07-20 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB44912F8962FA2714C7B8896BD86B9@PH0PR18MB4491.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=835703180@qq.com \
--cc=chandu@amd.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).