DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
To: Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"xuan.ding@intel.com" <xuan.ding@intel.com>,
	"xiaoyun.li@intel.com" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"yuanx.wang@intel.com" <yuanx.wang@intel.com>,
	"mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	"yuying.zhang@intel.com" <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	"qi.z.zhang@intel.com" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"viacheslavo@nvidia.com" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: support mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 18:14:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB4750980E1F473C2C8DB67DABCB5C9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221006175355.1327673-1-hpothula@marvell.com>

Hello Andrew/Thomas/Ferruh,

Thank You for your comments. I have taken care and uploaded new patch-set.
As tomorrow is RC1 release. Could you please help in reviewing the changes and in merging the changes, if changes looks good.

Regards,
Hanumanth 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hanumanth Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 11:24 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; xuan.ding@intel.com; wenxuanx.wu@intel.com;
> xiaoyun.li@intel.com; stephen@networkplumber.org; yuanx.wang@intel.com;
> mdr@ashroe.eu; yuying.zhang@intel.com; qi.z.zhang@intel.com;
> viacheslavo@nvidia.com; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; Hanumanth Reddy
> Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: support mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue
> 
> This patch adds support for multiple mempool capability.
> Some of the HW has support for choosing memory pools based on the packet's
> size. The capability allows PMD to choose a memory pool based on the packet's
> length.
> 
> This is often useful for saving the memory where the application can create a
> different pool to steer the specific size of the packet, thus enabling effective use
> of memory.
> 
> For example, let's say HW has a capability of three pools,
>  - pool-1 size is 2K
>  - pool-2 size is > 2K and < 4K
>  - pool-3 size is > 4K
> Here,
>         pool-1 can accommodate packets with sizes < 2K
>         pool-2 can accommodate packets with sizes > 2K and < 4K
>         pool-3 can accommodate packets with sizes > 4K
> 
> With multiple mempool capability enabled in SW, an application may create
> three pools of different sizes and send them to PMD. Allowing PMD to program
> HW based on the packet lengths. So that packets with less than 2K are received
> on pool-1, packets with lengths between 2K and 4K are received on pool-2 and
> finally packets greater than 4K are received on pool-3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanumanth Pothula <hpothula@marvell.com>
> 
> v6:
>  - Updated release notes, release_22_11.rst.
> v5:
>  - Declared memory pools as struct rte_mempool **rx_mempools rather than
>    as struct rte_mempool *mp.
>  - Added the feature in release notes.
>  - Updated conditions and strings as per review comments.
> v4:
>  - Renamed Offload capability name from
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SORT
>    to RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL.
>  - In struct rte_eth_rxconf, defined new pointer, which holds array of
>    type struct rte_eth_rx_mempool(memory pools). This array is used
>    by PMD to program multiple mempools.
> v3:
>  - Implemented Pool Sort capability as new Rx offload capability,
>    RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SORT.
> v2:
>  - Along with spec changes, uploading testpmd and driver changes.
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.rst |  6 +++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c                | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h                | 22 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.rst
> index 2e076ba2ad..8bb19155d9 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.rst
> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ New Features
>       Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
>       =======================================================
> 
> +* ** Added support ethdev support for mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx
> +queue.**
> +
> +  * Added new Rx offload flag ``RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL`` to
> support
> +    mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue. Thisi capability allows PMD to choose
> +    a memory pool based on the packet's length
> +
>  * **Updated Wangxun ngbe driver.**
> 
>    * Added support to set device link down/up.
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c index
> 1979dc0850..eed4834e6b 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -1634,6 +1634,44 @@ rte_eth_dev_is_removed(uint16_t port_id)
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static int
> +rte_eth_rx_queue_check_mempool(struct rte_mempool **rx_mempool,
> +			       uint16_t n_pool, uint32_t *mbp_buf_size,
> +			       const struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info) {
> +	uint16_t pool_idx;
> +
> +	if (n_pool > dev_info->max_pools) {
> +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> +			       "Too many Rx mempools %u vs maximum %u\n",
> +			       n_pool, dev_info->max_pools);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (pool_idx = 0; pool_idx < n_pool; pool_idx++) {
> +		struct rte_mempool *mpl = rx_mempool[pool_idx];
> +
> +		if (mpl == NULL) {
> +			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "null Rx mempool pointer\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		*mbp_buf_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mpl);
> +		if (*mbp_buf_size < dev_info->min_rx_bufsize +
> +		    RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM) {
> +			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> +				       "%s mbuf_data_room_size %u < %u
> (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM=%u + min_rx_bufsize(dev)=%u)\n",
> +					mpl->name, *mbp_buf_size,
> +					RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM +
> dev_info->min_rx_bufsize,
> +					RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM,
> +					dev_info->min_rx_bufsize);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split(const struct rte_eth_rxseg_split *rx_seg,
>  			     uint16_t n_seg, uint32_t *mbp_buf_size, @@ -
> 1733,9 +1771,12 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t
> rx_queue_id,
> 
>  	if (mp != NULL) {
>  		/* Single pool configuration check. */
> -		if (rx_conf != NULL && rx_conf->rx_nseg != 0) {
> +		if (((rx_conf->offloads &
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) &&
> +		    rx_conf != NULL && rx_conf->rx_nseg != 0) ||
> +		   ((rx_conf->offloads &
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL) &&
> +		    rx_conf != NULL && rx_conf->rx_npool != 0)) {
>  			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> -				       "Ambiguous segment configuration\n");
> +				       "Ambiguous Rx mempools
> configuration\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  		/*
> @@ -1763,30 +1804,43 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t
> rx_queue_id,
>  				       dev_info.min_rx_bufsize);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) {
>  		const struct rte_eth_rxseg_split *rx_seg;
>  		uint16_t n_seg;
> 
>  		/* Extended multi-segment configuration check. */
>  		if (rx_conf == NULL || rx_conf->rx_seg == NULL || rx_conf-
> >rx_nseg == 0) {
>  			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> -				       "Memory pool is null and no extended
> configuration provided\n");
> +				       "Memory pool is null and no multi-segment
> configuration
> +provided\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> 
>  		rx_seg = (const struct rte_eth_rxseg_split *)rx_conf->rx_seg;
>  		n_seg = rx_conf->rx_nseg;
> 
> -		if (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT)
> {
> -			ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split(rx_seg, n_seg,
> +		ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split(rx_seg, n_seg,
>  							   &mbp_buf_size,
>  							   &dev_info);
> -			if (ret != 0)
> -				return ret;
> -		} else {
> -			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "No Rx segmentation offload
> configured\n");
> +		if (ret != 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else if (rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL)
> {
> +		/* Extended multi-pool configuration check. */
> +		if (rx_conf == NULL || rx_conf->rx_mempools == NULL ||
> rx_conf->rx_npool == 0) {
> +			RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> +				       "Memory pool is null and no multi-pool
> configuration
> +provided\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> +
> +		ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_check_mempool(rx_conf-
> >rx_mempools,
> +						     rx_conf->rx_npool,
> +						     &mbp_buf_size,
> +						     &dev_info);
> +
> +		if (ret != 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else {
> +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Missing Rx mempool
> configuration\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
>  	/* Use default specified by driver, if nb_rx_desc is zero */ diff --git
> a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h index
> b62ac5bb6f..306c2b3573 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1067,6 +1067,25 @@ struct rte_eth_rxconf {
>  	 */
>  	union rte_eth_rxseg *rx_seg;
> 
> +	/**
> +	 * Points to an array of mempools.
> +	 *
> +	 * Valid only when RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL flag is set
> in
> +	 * Rx offloads.
> +	 *
> +	 * This provides support for  multiple mbuf pools per Rx queue.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is often useful for saving the memory where the application can
> +	 * create a different pools to steer the specific size of the packet, thus
> +	 * enabling effective use of memory.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that on Rx scatter enable, a packet may be delivered using a
> chain
> +	 * of mbufs obtained from single mempool or multiple mempools based
> on
> +	 * the NIC implementation.
> +	 */
> +	struct rte_mempool **rx_mempools;
> +	uint16_t rx_npool; /** < number of mempools */
> +
>  	uint64_t reserved_64s[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
>  	void *reserved_ptrs[2];   /**< Reserved for future fields */
>  };
> @@ -1395,6 +1414,7 @@ struct rte_eth_conf {  #define
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM  RTE_BIT64(18)
>  #define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH         RTE_BIT64(19)
>  #define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT     RTE_BIT64(20)
> +#define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MUL_MEMPOOL      RTE_BIT64(21)
> 
>  #define RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM
> (RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | \
>  				 RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | \
> @@ -1615,6 +1635,8 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
>  	/** Configured number of Rx/Tx queues */
>  	uint16_t nb_rx_queues; /**< Number of Rx queues. */
>  	uint16_t nb_tx_queues; /**< Number of Tx queues. */
> +	/** Maximum number of pools supported per Rx queue. */
> +	uint16_t max_pools;
>  	/** Rx parameter recommendations */
>  	struct rte_eth_dev_portconf default_rxportconf;
>  	/** Tx parameter recommendations */
> --
> 2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-12 10:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] ethdev: introduce pool sort capability Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 13:27 ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 17:24   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: add command line argument 'rxseg-mode' Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-12 17:24   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] net/cnxk: introduce pool sort capability Hanumanth Pothula
2022-08-23  3:26   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ethdev: " Ding, Xuan
2022-08-24 15:33     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-08-30 12:08       ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-06 12:18         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-07  7:02           ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-07 11:24             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-07 21:31               ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-13  9:28                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 10:00                   ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-02  7:00   ` [PATCH v3 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-02  7:00     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: Add support for " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-02  7:00     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/cnxk: introduce " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-13  8:06     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-13  9:31       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 10:41         ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-09-15  7:07     ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-15  7:07       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-15  7:07       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/cnxk: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools Hanumanth Pothula
2022-09-28  9:43       ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: Add support for mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-09-28 11:06         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-06 17:01       ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: support " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:01         ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/cnxk: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:01         ` [PATCH v5 3/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:29         ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: " Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 14:13           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-06 17:53         ` [PATCH v6 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:53           ` [PATCH v6 2/3] net/cnxk: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 17:53           ` [PATCH v6 3/3] app/testpmd: " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-06 18:14           ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula [this message]
2022-10-07 14:37         ` [PATCH v7 0/4] ethdev: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37           ` [PATCH v7 1/4] ethdev: factor out helper function to check Rx mempool Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37           ` [PATCH v7 2/4] ethdev: support mulitiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 16:08             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-07 16:18               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 16:20                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-07 16:33                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:30               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37           ` [PATCH v7 3/4] net/cnxk: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 14:37           ` [PATCH v7 4/4] app/testpmd: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29         ` [PATCH v8 0/4] ethdev: " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29           ` [PATCH v8 1/4] ethdev: factor out helper function to check Rx mempool Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29           ` [PATCH v8 2/4] ethdev: support multiple mbuf pools per Rx queue Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 18:35             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-07 19:45               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29           ` [PATCH v8 3/4] net/cnxk: support mulitiple " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 17:29           ` [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: " Andrew Rybchenko
     [not found]             ` <PH0PR18MB47500560DC1793F68E7312DDCB5F9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2022-10-07 19:43               ` [EXT] " Andrew Rybchenko
2022-10-07 19:56                 ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-17  8:48             ` [PATCH v9 1/1] " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-21 15:57               ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-10-24  3:32                 ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-24  4:07               ` [PATCH v10 1/1] app/testpmd: support multiple " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-10-25  1:40                 ` [PATCH v11 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-01 14:13                   ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-03 12:15                   ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-03 12:36                     ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-03 15:20                       ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-04 15:38                         ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-07  5:31                   ` [PATCH v12 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-09  8:04                     ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-11-09 10:39                       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10  6:51                         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10  8:17                     ` [PATCH v13 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-10  9:01                       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10  9:31                         ` [EXT] " Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-11-10 10:16                       ` [PATCH v14 " Hanumanth Pothula
2022-11-10 10:47                         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-17  8:43                         ` Jiang, YuX
2022-11-17 11:38                           ` Hanumanth Reddy Pothula
2022-10-08 20:38           ` [PATCH v8 0/4] ethdev: support mulitiple " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR18MB4750980E1F473C2C8DB67DABCB5C9@PH0PR18MB4750.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=hpothula@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xuan.ding@intel.com \
    --cc=yuanx.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).