DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>
To: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com>,
	"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] app/testpmd: monitor state of primary process when using secondary
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 03:23:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH7PR12MB8596A4A5CCC22A6B1584AE14822FA@PH7PR12MB8596.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804113322.53650-1-14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

Hi Khadem,

Thank you for sharing but few thoughts here

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
> Sent: Monday, August 4, 2025 5:03 PM
> To: stephen@networkplumber.org; thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh
> <Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Khadem Ullah
> <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
> Subject: [PATCH v7] app/testpmd: monitor state of primary process when using
> secondary
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> In secondary processes, accessing device after primary has exited will cause
> crash.
>
> This patch adds a mechanism in testpmd to monitor the primary process from the
> secondary process.
> When primary process exits it forces secondary to exit avoiding issues from
> cleanup logic.
>
> Fixes: a550baf24af9 ('app/testpmd: support multi-process')
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 47
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> bb88555328..b7affa6da9 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -101,13 +101,15 @@
>  uint16_t verbose_level = 0; /**< Silent by default. */  int testpmd_logtype; /**< Log
> type for testpmd logs */
>
> +/* Maximum delay for exiting after primary process. */ #define
> +MONITOR_INTERVAL (500 * 1000)
> +
>  /* use main core for command line ? */
>  uint8_t interactive = 0;
>  uint8_t auto_start = 0;
>  uint8_t tx_first;
>  char cmdline_filename[PATH_MAX] = {0};
>  bool echo_cmdline_file;
> -
>  /*
>   * NUMA support configuration.
>   * When set, the NUMA support attempts to dispatch the allocation of the @@ -
> 4332,6 +4334,38 @@ signal_handler(int signum __rte_unused)
>         prompt_exit();
>  }
>
> +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> +/* Alarm signal handler, used to check that primary process */ static
> +void monitor_primary(void *arg __rte_unused) {
> +       if (rte_eal_primary_proc_alive(NULL)) {
> +               rte_eal_alarm_set(MONITOR_INTERVAL, monitor_primary, NULL);
> +       } else {
> +               /*
> +                * If primary process exits, then all the device information
> +                * is no longer valid. Calling any cleanup code is going to
> +                * run into use after free.
> +                */
> +               fprintf(stderr, "\nPrimary process is no longer active, exiting...\n");
> +               exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

Indeed, the idea for monitoring and finding if primary is still alive.
When we exit, should not we need graceful exit? If yes, we can not simply use `exit`, but need to use `eal_cleanup`.

Hence I request for rework with cleanup.

NACK: Vipin Varghese <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>

> +       }
> +}
> +
> +/* Setup handler to check when primary exits. */ static int
> +enable_primary_monitor(void)
> +{
> +       return rte_eal_alarm_set(MONITOR_INTERVAL, monitor_primary,
> +NULL); }
> +
> +static void
> +disable_primary_monitor(void)
> +{
> +       rte_eal_alarm_cancel(monitor_primary, NULL); } #endif
> +
>  int
>  main(int argc, char** argv)
>  {
> @@ -4363,6 +4397,12 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
>                 rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Cannot init EAL: %s\n",
>                          rte_strerror(rte_errno));
>
> +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> +       if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
> +           enable_primary_monitor() < 0)
> +               rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Cannot setup primary monitor");
> +#endif
> +
>         /* allocate port structures, and init them */
>         init_port();
>
> @@ -4556,6 +4596,11 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
>                 }
>         }
>
> +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> +       if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY)
> +               disable_primary_monitor(); #endif
> +
>         pmd_test_exit();
>
>  #ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> --
> 2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-08  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22 11:54 [PATCH] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 13:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 14:30   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 15:42     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 16:01       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 16:13         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-22 17:04           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 17:38             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 17:53               ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 18:21                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 19:03                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 19:05                   ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-22 22:28                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-23  4:29 ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23  4:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 12:19   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:13     ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:24       ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:26         ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:31           ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:10   ` [PATCH] [PATCH v3] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 13:19     ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-23 13:34       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-23 14:22         ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-24  5:49           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-25 13:00           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-25 12:55     ` [PATCH] [PATCH v4] " Khadem Ullah
2025-07-28 21:45       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-29  5:42         ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29 21:34           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-30  5:07             ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08  3:49               ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 15:32                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-29  6:39       ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix segfault in secondary process by monitoring primary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29  6:39         ` [PATCH] [PATCH v4] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29  6:39         ` [PATCH] [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: fix segfault in secondary process by monitoring primary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-29 14:48           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-29 21:48           ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-30  5:24             ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08  3:44               ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 16:17                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-30  5:56           ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: monitor state of primary process when using secondary Khadem Ullah
2025-07-30  6:08           ` [PATCH v6] " Khadem Ullah
2025-08-01 22:50             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-04  7:54           ` [PATCH v7] " Khadem Ullah
2025-08-04 11:33           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-04 15:44             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-05  0:50             ` fengchengwen
2025-08-08  3:23             ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2025-08-08  5:44               ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 10:59                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-08-08 11:49                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 16:49                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-08 17:01                       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 15:28                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-08 15:50                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-08-08 16:10               ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-23 14:21   ` [PATCH v2] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH7PR12MB8596A4A5CCC22A6B1584AE14822FA@PH7PR12MB8596.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
    --cc=14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk \
    --cc=Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).