DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Matz, Olivier" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Vidya Sagar Velumuri <vvelumuri@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/3] add TLS record processing security offload
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:22:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH8PR11MB6803DE29FFF59678551E37E3D7F9A@PH8PR11MB6803.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811071712.240-1-anoobj@marvell.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 8:17 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Akhil Goyal
> <gakhil@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Konstantin Ananyev
> <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Matz,
> Olivier <olivier.matz@6wind.com>; Vidya Sagar Velumuri
> <vvelumuri@marvell.com>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] add TLS record processing security offload
> 
> Add Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
> (DTLS). The protocols provide communications privacy for L4 protocols
> such as TCP & UDP.
> 
> TLS (and DTLS) protocol is composed of two layers,
> 1. TLS Record Protocol
> 2. TLS Handshake Protocol
> 
> While TLS Handshake Protocol helps in establishing security parameters
> by which client and server can communicate, TLS Record Protocol provides
> the connection security. TLS Record Protocol leverages symmetric
> cryptographic operations such as data encryption and authentication for
> providing security to the communications.
> 
> Cryptodevs that are capable of offloading TLS Record Protocol may
> perform other operations like IV generation, header insertion, atomic
> sequence number updates and anti-replay window check in addition to
> cryptographic transformations.
> 
> In record write operations, message content type is a per packet field
> which is used in constructing the TLS header. One session is expected
> to handle all types of content types and so, 'rte_crypto_op.aux_flags'
> is used for passing the same.
>
> The support is added for TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.2.
> 
> Akhil Goyal (1):
>   net: add headers for TLS/DTLS packets
> 
> Anoob Joseph (2):
>   security: add TLS record processing
>   cryptodev: add details of datapath handling of TLS records

Hi Folks,

I've reviewed these 3 patches, generally fine, with two main opens;

1) The part that I do not fully understand how it is defined is the
'rte_crypto_op.aux_flags' field usage, and what values to read/write there.

2) Error handling (again with aux_flags) is not well defined, and is critical
to correct (high-bw/high-packet-count) usage. I do not understand how to
do correct error handling today with aux_flags, so more docs/examples required.

Some detail-level comments inline in the patch files.

Regards -Harry

<snip>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11  7:17 Anoob Joseph
2023-08-11  7:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] net: add headers for TLS/DTLS packets Anoob Joseph
2023-09-20  9:22   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-08-11  7:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] security: add TLS record processing Anoob Joseph
2023-09-20  9:23   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-09-20 11:51     ` Anoob Joseph
2023-09-21  8:38       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-09-21 10:55         ` Anoob Joseph
2023-09-21 11:01           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-08-11  7:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] cryptodev: add details of datapath handling of TLS records Anoob Joseph
2023-09-20  9:24   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-09-20  9:22 ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2023-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] add TLS record processing security offload Anoob Joseph
2023-10-03 10:48   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: add headers for TLS/DTLS packets Anoob Joseph
2023-10-03 10:48   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] security: add TLS record processing Anoob Joseph
2023-10-03 10:48   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] security: support extra padding with TLS Anoob Joseph
2023-10-03 10:48   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] security: support TLS record lifetime notification Anoob Joseph
2023-10-03 10:48   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cryptodev: add details of datapath handling of TLS records Anoob Joseph
2023-10-04 10:51   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] add TLS record processing security offload Akhil Goyal
2023-10-04 15:44     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-10-09 20:08   ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH8PR11MB6803DE29FFF59678551E37E3D7F9A@PH8PR11MB6803.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vvelumuri@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).