From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wipro-blr-out02.wipro.com (wipro-blr-out02.wipro.com [203.91.198.75]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3B9B6F7; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:48:20 +0100 (CET) X-AuditID: cb5bdd58-f79ed6d0000022db-ed-54e31c7366b8 X-Invalid-Recipients: Received: from BLR-OUT-EDG02.wipro.com ( [203.91.193.61]) by wipro-blr-out02.wipro.com (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 62.D7.08923.37C13E45; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:18:19 +0530 (IST) Received: from BLR-EC-MBX2.wipro.com (10.208.51.112) by BLR-OUT-EDG02.wipro.com (203.91.193.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:16:50 +0530 Received: from wipro-blr-tls01.wipro.com (203.91.193.100) by BLR-EC-MBX2.wipro.com (10.208.51.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:16:49 +0530 Received: from APAC01-SG1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.51.90) by wipro-blr-tls01.wipro.com (203.91.193.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:16:39 +0530 Received: from SIXPR03MB0605.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.174.147) by SIXPR03MB0607.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.174.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.87.18; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:46:36 +0000 Received: from SIXPR03MB0605.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.174.147]) by SIXPR03MB0605.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.174.147]) with mapi id 15.01.0087.013; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:46:36 +0000 From: To: Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Lcore-vports-queues mapping Thread-Index: AQHQSppuMcvMc7ec6Uuj+5eMVE2M6Jz0oOUggAADFYCAAAEKcA== Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:46:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150217101342.GA9356@bricha3-MOBL3> <20150217102921.GB9356@bricha3-MOBL3> In-Reply-To: <20150217102921.GB9356@bricha3-MOBL3> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [203.145.180.6] authentication-results: intel.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SIXPR03MB0607; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SIXPR03MB0607; x-forefront-prvs: 0490BBA1F0 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(51704005)(24454002)(87936001)(2950100001)(102836002)(2900100001)(74316001)(106116001)(50986999)(77156002)(19580395003)(54356999)(86362001)(230783001)(40100003)(92566002)(110136001)(19580405001)(66066001)(62966003)(33656002)(122556002)(76576001)(2656002)(76176999)(46102003)(93886004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SIXPR03MB0607; H:SIXPR03MB0605.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Feb 2015 10:46:36.4452 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 258ac4e4-146a-411e-9dc8-79a9e12fd6da X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SIXPR03MB0607 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: SIXPR03MB0607.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: BLR-HES-EDG04.wipro.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: BLR-HES-EDG04.wipro.com X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: dev-bounces@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Lcore-vports-queues mapping X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:48:22 -0000 I am using OVDK (dpdk openvswitch ), where I need to enhance the packet pro= cessing speed on DPDK data path by modifying lcore-- port-- queue mapping . -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:59 PM To: Kuldeep Samasi (WT01 - Global Media & Telecom) Cc: dev-bounces@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Lcore-vports-queues mapping On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:20:14AM +0000, kuldeep.samasi@wipro.com wrote: > Hi Bruce , >=20 > Thanks for suggestion , I want to map the lcore -- vport -- queue manuall= y by command prompt , which program file I needs to enhance . >=20 What application are you using? DPDK is primarily a set of libraries, and c= ontains some apps purely as examples or for testing. /Bruce >=20 >=20 > Regards > Kuldeep >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:44 PM > To: Kuldeep Samasi (WT01 - Global Media & Telecom) > Cc: dev-bounces@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Lcore-vports-queues mapping >=20 > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:08:07AM +0000, kuldeep.samasi@wipro.com wrote: > > Hi Team , > >=20 > > I am using DPDK-1.7.1 , I am trying find out how to map lcore -- >vport= s -- > queuesin code level as well as user command prompt level . > > Suggestions are welcome on this . > >=20 > > > Hi, >=20 > cores and ports and queues can be mapped just about any way that your app= lication wants. The only real restriction is that two cores cannot poll the= same queue on the same port at the same time. > You can set up your app to have each port polled by a single core, or to = have all ports polled by one core, or to have one port polled by multiple c= ores (using different queues). >=20 > Regards, > /Bruce