DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes to rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit api
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 04:04:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR18MB4413F922E4307AFED3904B3AC1899@SJ0PR18MB4413.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3410736.z0yIoBN5P9@thomas>

Thanks Thomas. I will send v2 with uint32_t type.

Thanks,
Satha.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 7:34 PM
To: Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>; dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yigit@amd.com; bruce.richardson@intel.com; konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru; ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes to rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit api

07/07/2022 15:38, Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi:
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> > On 7/1/22 18:32, skoteshwar@marvell.com wrote:
> > > +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit`` takes 
> > > +``rate``
> > > in Mbps. +  This parameter declared as uint16_t, queue rate 
> > > limited to 64Gbps. +``rate``
> > > +  parameter will be modified to uint64_t in DPDK 22.11 so that it 
> > > +can work for
> > > +  more than 64Gbps.
> > 
> > I fully agree that uint16_t is not enough, but I'd like to 
> > understand the reason behind uint64_t vs uint32_t. It looks like 
> > uint32_t is more than enough.

> yes uint32_t is enough, proposed uint64_t so that the rate in TM 
> shaper profile is also uint64_t in bps

I don't see how both are related.
Why not stick to uint32_t for this parameter?

Also I'm not sure it is breakage.
If it was, it could have been handled with function versioning.
But anyway it is a small change, I am OK with uint32_t.



  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-13  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01 15:32 skoteshwar
2022-07-07 12:52 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-07-07 13:38   ` [EXT] " Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
2022-07-12 13:10     ` Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
2022-07-12 14:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-13  4:04       ` Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi [this message]
2022-07-13  6:26 ` [PATCH v2] " skoteshwar
2022-07-13  6:46   ` Jerin Jacob
2022-07-15 13:25 ` [PATCH v3] doc: announce changes to rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit API skoteshwar
2022-07-15 14:23   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-07-15 16:29     ` Ajit Khaparde
2022-07-16 18:05       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SJ0PR18MB4413F922E4307AFED3904B3AC1899@SJ0PR18MB4413.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).