From: "Jeff Venable, Sr." <jeff@vectranetworks.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>, lhffjzh <lhffjzh@126.com>,
"'Thomas Monjalon'" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:47:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN1PR08MB1376864591D40CDB4E390E83A0820@SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A80D97C@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Is the I40E incapable of operating RSS with ETH_RSS_IP (i.e. hashing without L4 ports)?
Thanks,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:34 AM
To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon'
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC
Good to know that!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lhffjzh [mailto:lhffjzh@126.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:34 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; 'Thomas Monjalon'
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network
> packet by i40e NIC
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> Thanks a lot for your great help, all of rx queue received network
> packet after I update rss_hf from "ETH_RSS_IP" to " ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK ".
>
> static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
> .rxmode = {
> .mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_RSS,
> .max_rx_pkt_len = ETHER_MAX_LEN,
> .split_hdr_size = 0,
> .header_split = 0, /**< Header Split disabled */
> .hw_ip_checksum = 1, /**< IP checksum offload enabled */
> .hw_vlan_filter = 0, /**< VLAN filtering disabled */
> .jumbo_frame = 0, /**< Jumbo Frame Support disabled */
> .hw_strip_crc = 0, /**< CRC stripped by hardware */
> },
> .rx_adv_conf = {
> .rss_conf = {
> .rss_key = NULL,
> .rss_hf = ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK,
> },
> },
> .txmode = {
> .mq_mode = ETH_MQ_TX_NONE,
> },
> .fdir_conf.mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE, };
>
>
> Regards,
> Haifeng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM
> To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon'
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network
> packet by i40e NIC
>
> Hi Haifeng
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of lhffjzh
> > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:48 AM
> > To: 'Thomas Monjalon'
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network
> > packet
> by
> > i40e NIC
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Thanks very much for your reminder, you give me many help in this
> > mail
> list.
> >
> > The issue with detailed information just as below. but I don't know
> > who is
> the
> > dpdk i40e maintainers? is maintainers@dpdk.org?
> >
> > Hardware list:
> > 2 i40e 40G NICs
> > Xeon E5-2670 v2(10 cores)
> > 32G memory
> >
> > I loopback 2 i40e NICs by QSFP cable, one NIC send UDP network
> > packet by DPDK, and another for receiving. I bind 4 processor's
> > logical cores with 4
> rx
> > queue "0,1,2,3" on receiving NIC, when I start to send packet, only
> > rx
> queue
> > "0"
> > can receive
> > the UDP packet, the others queue always receive nothing. but it is
> > work
> well on
> > ixgbe 10G NICs, I can receive network packet from all rx queues.
> > does
> anyone
> > kindly know why?
> Could you help to list the DPDK version you are using now?
> Two possible reasons:
> 1. UDP rss is not enabled on your board correctly.
> I40e has different rss flags from ixgbe, so I am wondering if you use
> it correctly.
> In addition, this will be unified from 2.0. So I care about the DPDK version.
> 2. The UDP stream is occasionally hit the hash key of queue 0.
> You'd better to try to send your UDP stream with random 5-tuples, to
> get the
> hash value hit different queues randomly.
>
> Regards,
> Helin
>
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Haifeng
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:55 PM
> > To: lhffjzh
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by
> > i40e NIC
> >
> > 2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0"
> > can
> > > receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of
> > > network packet has same destination ip address but has more than
> > > 200 different source ip address.
> >
> > It's possible that you don't have any answer for 2 reasons:
> > - you replied in a thread dedicated to Cisco enic questions
> > - you didn't describe your usage enough to understand your problem
> >
> > I suggest to use the button "new email" instead of "reply all" to
> > start a new question with enough details.
> >
> > Did you noticed you put some Cisco guys in CC instead of putting the
> > Intel responsible for i40e (see MAINTAINERS file)?
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-25 17:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] enicpmd: License text Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] enicpmd: Makefile Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] enicpmd: VNIC common code partially shared with ENIC kernel mode driver Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] enicpmd: pmd specific code Sujith Sankar
2014-11-27 14:49 ` Wodkowski, PawelX
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] enicpmd: DPDK-ENIC PMD interface Sujith Sankar
2014-12-29 8:15 ` Wu, Jingjing
2014-12-30 4:45 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2015-01-06 9:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-30 8:53 ` Wu, Jingjing
2014-11-25 17:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] enicpmd: DPDK changes for accommodating ENIC PMD Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 19:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD David Marchand
2014-11-26 22:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-27 4:27 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2014-11-27 15:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-20 11:25 ` David Marchand
2015-01-21 5:03 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2015-02-26 11:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-26 13:08 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-02-27 8:09 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2015-02-27 8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC lhffjzh
2015-02-27 9:03 ` lhffjzh
2015-02-27 10:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-28 1:47 ` lhffjzh
2015-02-28 3:17 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-02-28 4:33 ` lhffjzh
2015-02-28 14:33 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-23 0:47 ` Jeff Venable, Sr. [this message]
2015-07-23 0:56 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-30 1:58 ` Jeff Venable, Sr.
2015-07-31 15:35 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-02-27 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-11 9:05 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2015-05-11 9:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-25 20:11 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN1PR08MB1376864591D40CDB4E390E83A0820@SN1PR08MB1376.namprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=jeff@vectranetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=lhffjzh@126.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).