DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	"Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Narayana Prasad <pathreya@marvell.com>,
	 Lukasz Bartosik <lbartosik@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/ipsec-secgw: increase number of qps to lcore_params
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:39:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2558ED9A9F8EBCB47AC50AAD9A070@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1580402318-3307-1-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com>


> Currently only one qp will be used for one core. The number of qps can
> be increased to match the number of lcore params.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Bartosik <lbartosik@marvell.com>
> ---
>  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c       | 13 +++++++------
>  examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h       |  9 ++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> index 3b5aaf6..b49dfef 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> 
>  #define MAX_LCORE_PARAMS 1024
> 
> -#define UNPROTECTED_PORT(port) (unprotected_port_mask & (1 << portid))
> +#define UNPROTECTED_PORT(port) (unprotected_port_mask & (1 << port))
> 
>  /*
>   * Configurable number of RX/TX ring descriptors
> @@ -968,20 +968,25 @@ route6_pkts(struct rt_ctx *rt_ctx, struct rte_mbuf *pkts[], uint8_t nb_pkts)
>  }
> 
>  static inline void
> -process_pkts(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> -		uint8_t nb_pkts, uint16_t portid)
> +process_pkts(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct lcore_rx_queue *rx_queue,
> +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint8_t nb_pkts)
>  {
>  	struct ipsec_traffic traffic;
> 
>  	prepare_traffic(pkts, &traffic, nb_pkts);
> 
> +	qconf->inbound.port_id = rx_queue->port_id;
> +	qconf->inbound.queue_id = rx_queue->queue_id;
> +	qconf->outbound.port_id = rx_queue->port_id;
> +	qconf->outbound.queue_id = rx_queue->queue_id;
> +
>  	if (unlikely(single_sa)) {
> -		if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(portid))
> +		if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(rx_queue->port_id))
>  			process_pkts_inbound_nosp(&qconf->inbound, &traffic);
>  		else
>  			process_pkts_outbound_nosp(&qconf->outbound, &traffic);
>  	} else {
> -		if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(portid))
> +		if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(rx_queue->port_id))
>  			process_pkts_inbound(&qconf->inbound, &traffic);
>  		else
>  			process_pkts_outbound(&qconf->outbound, &traffic);
> @@ -1169,7 +1174,7 @@ main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
>  					pkts, MAX_PKT_BURST);
> 
>  			if (nb_rx > 0)
> -				process_pkts(qconf, pkts, nb_rx, portid);
> +				process_pkts(qconf, &rxql[i], pkts, nb_rx);
> 
>  			/* dequeue and process completed crypto-ops */
>  			if (UNPROTECTED_PORT(portid))
> @@ -1709,6 +1714,8 @@ add_mapping(struct rte_hash *map, const char *str, uint16_t cdev_id,
>  	unsigned long i;
>  	struct cdev_key key = { 0 };
> 
> +	key.port_id = params->port_id;
> +	key.queue_id = params->queue_id;
>  	key.lcore_id = params->lcore_id;
>  	if (cipher)
>  		key.cipher_algo = cipher->sym.cipher.algo;
> @@ -1722,7 +1729,9 @@ add_mapping(struct rte_hash *map, const char *str, uint16_t cdev_id,
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < ipsec_ctx->nb_qps; i++)
> -		if (ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].id == cdev_id)
> +		if (ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].id == cdev_id &&
> +		    ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].port_id == key.port_id &&
> +		    ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].port_queue_id == key.queue_id)

I didn't test the patch, but at first glance this approach seems
reasonable to me with one main objection -
I don't think this new mapping method should become default and only possible one.
Probably need an extra option to allow user to select,
while keeping current mapping method as a default one.
Then this option could be translated into some global mask that will be applied
to cdev_key before add/lookup or so.  

>  			break;
> 
>  	if (i == ipsec_ctx->nb_qps) {
> @@ -1733,9 +1742,12 @@ add_mapping(struct rte_hash *map, const char *str, uint16_t cdev_id,
>  		}
>  		ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].id = cdev_id;
>  		ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].qp = qp;
> +		ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].port_id = key.port_id;
> +		ipsec_ctx->tbl[i].port_queue_id = key.queue_id;
>  		ipsec_ctx->nb_qps++;
> -		printf("%s cdev mapping: lcore %u using cdev %u qp %u "
> -				"(cdev_id_qp %lu)\n", str, key.lcore_id,
> +		printf("%s cdev mapping: lcore %u, portid %u, queueid %u "
> +				"using cdev %u qp %u (cdev_id_qp %lu)\n",
> +				str, key.lcore_id, key.port_id, key.queue_id,
>  				cdev_id, qp, i);
>  	}
> 
> @@ -1849,7 +1861,7 @@ cryptodevs_init(void)
>  		rte_panic("Failed to create cdev_map hash table, errno = %d\n",
>  				rte_errno);
> 
> -	printf("lcore/cryptodev/qp mappings:\n");
> +	printf("lcore/portid/queueid/cryptodev/qp mappings:\n");
> 
>  	idx = 0;
>  	for (cdev_id = 0; cdev_id < rte_cryptodev_count(); cdev_id++) {
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> index d4b5712..68059d8 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ create_lookaside_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
>  	struct cdev_key key = { 0 };
> 
>  	key.lcore_id = (uint8_t)rte_lcore_id();
> +	key.port_id = ipsec_ctx->port_id;
> +	key.queue_id = ipsec_ctx->queue_id;
> 
>  	key.cipher_algo = (uint8_t)sa->cipher_algo;
>  	key.auth_algo = (uint8_t)sa->auth_algo;
> @@ -72,12 +74,11 @@ create_lookaside_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
>  			(void **)&cdev_id_qp);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> -				"No cryptodev: core %u, cipher_algo %u, "
> -				"auth_algo %u, aead_algo %u\n",
> -				key.lcore_id,
> -				key.cipher_algo,
> -				key.auth_algo,
> -				key.aead_algo);
> +				"No cryptodev: core %u, port_id %u, "
> +				"queue_id %u, cipher_algo %u, auth_algo %u, "
> +				"aead_algo %u\n",
> +				key.lcore_id, key.port_id, key.queue_id,
> +				key.cipher_algo, key.auth_algo, key.aead_algo);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> 
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> index 8e07521..b76cb50 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ struct cdev_qp {
>  	uint16_t qp;
>  	uint16_t in_flight;
>  	uint16_t len;
> +	uint16_t port_id;
> +	uint16_t port_queue_id;
>  	struct rte_crypto_op *buf[MAX_PKT_BURST] __rte_aligned(sizeof(void *));
>  };
> 
> @@ -197,10 +199,15 @@ struct ipsec_ctx {
>  	uint16_t ol_pkts_cnt;
>  	uint64_t ipv4_offloads;
>  	uint64_t ipv6_offloads;
> +	/* port_id and queue_id are used to select crypto qp */
> +	uint16_t port_id;
> +	uint16_t queue_id;
>  };
> 
>  struct cdev_key {
> -	uint16_t lcore_id;
> +	uint16_t port_id;
> +	uint8_t queue_id;
> +	uint8_t lcore_id;
>  	uint8_t cipher_algo;
>  	uint8_t auth_algo;
>  	uint8_t aead_algo;
> --
> 2.7.4


      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-31 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10 14:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Anoob Joseph
2020-01-29 22:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-30 16:28   ` Anoob Joseph
2020-01-31 16:32     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-31 17:04       ` Anoob Joseph
2020-01-31 18:49         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-02-03  9:05           ` Anoob Joseph
2020-02-03  9:15             ` Akhil Goyal
2020-02-03  9:22               ` Anoob Joseph
2020-02-06 10:46                 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-02-06 11:30                   ` Akhil Goyal
2020-02-06 11:32                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 16:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Anoob Joseph
2020-01-31 17:39   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB2558ED9A9F8EBCB47AC50AAD9A070@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=lbartosik@marvell.com \
    --cc=pathreya@marvell.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).