DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"ravi1.kumar@amd.com" <ravi1.kumar@amd.com>,
	"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	"tdu@semihalf.com" <tdu@semihalf.com>,
	"rnagadheeraj@marvell.com" <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
	"adwivedi@marvell.com" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2880E5D9C44F3BA49D27DF41E4D80@SN6PR11MB2880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416092532.1922099-1-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:25 AM
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; ravi1.kumar@amd.com; ruifeng.wang@arm.com;
> anoobj@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona
> <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; tdu@semihalf.com; rnagadheeraj@marvell.com; adwivedi@marvell.com;
> g.singh@nxp.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; jianjay.zhou@huawei.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; akhil.goyal@nxp.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
> 
> This patchset is the phase two of the crypto test refactoring
> effort. It mainly focuses on removing the PMD bitmask used
> to select which PMDs are used to run the tests against.
> Instead, now all PMDs will run all test cases and the capability
> checking will determine which ones are supported and therefore,
> are not skipped.
> 
> Since there are tests cases that require sessionless support,
> a new feature flag has been added, which reflects this support per PMD.
> 
> I am CC'ing all PMD maintainers, asking for their collaboration to
> test this patchset, as this might impact the testing of each PMD.
> 
> 
> This patchset depends on:
> (1) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68433/ (crypto/openssl: fix out-of-place encryption)
> (2) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68434/ (cryptodev: add missing feature name)
> (3) http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/68677/ (Crypto test refactoring (first phase))
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Added new commit, adding a check for out-of-place operations
> 
> Pablo de Lara (4):
>   cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag
>   test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless
>   test/crypto: check if device supports out-of-place ops
>   test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests

Series Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14 18:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] " Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38   ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38   ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:38   ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Crypto test refactoring (second phase) Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 13:28   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-16 15:23     ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16  9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] " Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16  9:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:27     ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16  9:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:27     ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16  9:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/crypto: check if device supports out-of-place ops Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 13:41     ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 15:28     ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16  9:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:28     ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 16:52   ` Trahe, Fiona [this message]
2020-04-19 21:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Crypto test refactoring (second phase) Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB2880E5D9C44F3BA49D27DF41E4D80@SN6PR11MB2880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
    --cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=tdu@semihalf.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).