DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "McDaniel, Timothy" <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
	"Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>,
	"Van Haaren,  Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"Ma, Liang J" <liang.j.ma@intel.com>,
	"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add umonitor umwait to x86 cpuflags
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:45:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB31036BD9A606A46481A74EFB9E230@SN6PR11MB3103.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB33011E58B6D679A7D007CE349A240@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 11:37 AM
> To: McDaniel, Timothy <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>; Eads, Gage
> <gage.eads@intel.com>; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>;
> Ma, Liang J <liang.j.ma@intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly
> <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal: add umonitor umwait to x86 cpuflags
> 
> 
> >
> > umonitor/umwait are user-level versions of the monitor/mwait
> > instructions. These allow the core to wait in a low-power state
> > until a specified cache line is accessed, a timeout occurs,
> > or the core is interrupted.
> 
> Isn't it a duplicate to:
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/76554/
> ?
Yes, the new rte_cpuflags.[ch] bit definitions for umonitor/umwait appear to be duplicates. I am not opposed to
dropping my patch, so long as this new bit gets defined in some other patch that makes it into 20.11.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Timothy McDaniel <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h | 1 +
> >  lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c         | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h
> > index c1d2036..ab2c3b3 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h
> > @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ enum rte_cpu_flag_t {
> >  	RTE_CPUFLAG_CLDEMOTE,               /**< Cache Line Demote */
> >  	RTE_CPUFLAG_MOVDIRI,                /**< Direct Store Instructions */
> >  	RTE_CPUFLAG_MOVDIR64B,              /**< Direct Store Instructions 64B
> */
> > +	RTE_CPUFLAG_UMWAIT,                 /**< UMONITOR/UMWAIT */
> >  	RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512VP2INTERSECT,     /**< AVX512 Two Register
> Intersection */
> >
> >  	/* The last item */
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c b/lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> > index 30439e7..6bed3eb 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ const struct feature_entry rte_cpu_feature_table[] = {
> >  	FEAT_DEF(CLDEMOTE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 25)
> >  	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIRI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 27)
> >  	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIR64B, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 28)
> > +	FEAT_DEF(UMWAIT, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 5)
> >  	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VP2INTERSECT, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EDX, 8)
> >  };
> >
> > --
> > 2.6.4


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-11 16:26 Timothy McDaniel
2020-09-11 16:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-14 16:45   ` McDaniel, Timothy [this message]
2020-10-09 15:21   ` McDaniel, Timothy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB31036BD9A606A46481A74EFB9E230@SN6PR11MB3103.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=liang.j.ma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).