From: "Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Changchun" <changchun.zhang@oracle.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "gakhil@marvell.com" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [External] : [PATCH] crypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb for partial hash
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 14:21:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB34087B1A50F18E4D92B8E5D581CE9@SN6PR11MB3408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR10MB47569F996E04857C09B1F80084F59@CO1PR10MB4756.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
Please see v2: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=22973
Regards
Kai
Does it mean the intel-ipsec-mb would be prerequisite of applying QAT offloading for security application? It this is the case, as I know, the intel-ipsec-mb has no FIPS certification yet. Thus I am thinking this would impact existing QAT based security application, right?
Best Regards,
Changchun Zhang
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3692 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 15:29 Fan Zhang
2022-04-14 18:45 ` [External] : " Changchun Zhang
2022-04-20 18:14 ` Changchun Zhang
2022-05-17 14:21 ` Ji, Kai [this message]
2022-05-17 14:16 ` [dpdk-dev v2 1/2] build: add in option for qat use intel ipsec-mb lib Kai Ji
2022-05-17 14:16 ` [dpdk-dev v2 2/2] crypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb for partial hash & aes Kai Ji
2022-05-17 15:01 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-17 15:00 ` [dpdk-dev v2 1/2] build: add in option for qat use intel ipsec-mb lib Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-18 8:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-18 10:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-18 10:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-18 13:35 ` Ji, Kai
2022-05-19 9:14 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-19 10:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-19 12:25 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-19 14:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-05-19 9:22 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-19 11:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB34087B1A50F18E4D92B8E5D581CE9@SN6PR11MB3408.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=kai.ji@intel.com \
--cc=changchun.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).