DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
	"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx and Tx path segment
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:12:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN7PR11MB7139FDF692C0183D05D9ED49E5009@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB5994F18B2D5E4D57CD849224D7019@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Sent: 2022年11月10日 18:37
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX
> <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Wu,
> Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Ferruh
> Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx and Tx path segment
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 8:56 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Zhou,
> > YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Ye, MingjinX
> > <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Lu,
> > Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>;
> > Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Ferruh Yigit
> > <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx and Tx path segment
> >
> > CRC is stripped by the hardware in the scattered Rx path. If the last
> > buffer packet length is '0', the scalar Tx path would send empty
> > buffer that causes the Tx queue to overflow.
> 
> Please separate this patch into two, one for Rx and one for Tx, they are
> independent.
> 
> For the Tx implementation, I think we can move them into tx_prepare where
> is place to check Tx violation.
Thanks for your suggestion, I will provide 2 new patches according to the new
scheme and promote it to the community.
> 
> >
> > This patch adds a judgment for the last buffer length to fix this
> > issue, so that it would free the mbuf associated to the last one if the last
> buffer is empty.
> >
> > Fixes: 6eac0b7fde95 ("net/ice: support advance Rx/Tx")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> >
> > v2:
> > 	* Fix log level in ice_rxtx.c source file.
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 53
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > index 0a2b0376ac..b181f66aad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2111,6 +2111,10 @@ ice_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue,
> >  			} else
> >  				rxm->data_len = (uint16_t)(rx_packet_len -
> >
> > RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN);
> > +		} else if (rx_packet_len == 0) {
> > +			rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(rxm);
> > +			first_seg->nb_segs--;
> > +			last_seg->next = NULL;
> >  		}
> >
> >  		first_seg->port = rxq->port_id;
> > @@ -2903,6 +2907,35 @@ ice_calc_pkt_desc(struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt)
> >  	return count;
> >  }
> >
> > +/*Check the number of valid mbufs and free the invalid mbufs*/ static
> > +inline uint16_t ice_check_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt) {
> > +	struct rte_mbuf *txd = tx_pkt;
> > +	struct rte_mbuf *txd_removal = NULL;
> > +	struct rte_mbuf *txd_pre = NULL;
> > +	uint16_t count = 0;
> > +	uint16_t removal = 0;
> > +
> > +	while (txd != NULL) {
> > +		if (removal == 1 || txd->data_len == 0) {
> > +			txd_removal = txd;
> > +			txd = txd->next;
> > +			if (removal == 0) {
> > +				removal = 1;
> > +				txd_pre->next = NULL;
> > +			}
> > +			rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(txd_removal);
> > +		} else {
> > +			++count;
> > +			txd_pre = txd;
> > +			txd = txd->next;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return count;
> > +}
> > +
> >  uint16_t
> >  ice_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t
> > nb_pkts) { @@ -2960,11 +2993,27 @@ ice_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue,
> > struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> >  		 * the mbuf data size exceeds max data size that hw allows
> >  		 * per tx desc.
> >  		 */
> > -		if (ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG)
> > +		if (ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG) {
> >  			nb_used = (uint16_t)(ice_calc_pkt_desc(tx_pkt) +
> >  					     nb_ctx);
> > -		else
> > +		} else {
> > +			nb_used = ice_check_mbuf(tx_pkt);
> > +			if (nb_used == 0) {
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(ERR,
> > +				"Check packets is empty "
> > +				"(port=%d queue=%d)\n",
> > +				txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> > +				continue;
> > +			} else if (nb_used < tx_pkt->nb_segs) {
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(DEBUG,
> > +				"Check packets valid num ="
> > +				"%4u total num = %4u (port=%d
> > queue=%d)\n",
> > +				nb_used, tx_pkt->nb_segs, txq->port_id,
> txq-
> > >queue_id);
> > +				tx_pkt->nb_segs = nb_used;
> > +			}
> >  			nb_used = (uint16_t)(tx_pkt->nb_segs + nb_ctx);
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		tx_last = (uint16_t)(tx_id + nb_used - 1);
> >
> >  		/* Circular ring */
> > --
> > 2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-11  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-03 17:20 [PATCH] " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-04  6:57 ` Xu, Ke1
2022-11-09 12:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-10  2:01   ` Xu, Ke1
2022-11-10 10:37   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11  3:12     ` Ye, MingjinX [this message]
2022-11-11 12:04   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11  4:59     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11 12:04     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/ice: fix scalar Tx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11  5:09       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11  8:30         ` Ye, MingjinX
2022-11-11  8:45           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11 16:01       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11 16:01         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: fix scalar Tx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11 16:12       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] net/ice: fix scalar Rx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11  9:03         ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11  9:13           ` Xu, Ke1
2022-11-11 16:12         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: fix scalar Tx " Mingjin Ye
2022-11-11  9:01           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-11-11  9:14             ` Xu, Ke1
2023-09-19  8:15           ` David Marchand
2023-09-27  8:44             ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN7PR11MB7139FDF692C0183D05D9ED49E5009@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).