DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
@ 2019-04-12  6:02 Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-12  6:02 ` Gagandeep Singh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-12  6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev


> 
> 
> On 4/10/2019 12:12 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
> >> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing
> mode
> >>
> >> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
> >> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> >>> Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
> >>> don't care.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
> >>
> >> Hi Gagandeep,
> >>
> >> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
> >> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
> >>
> > Hi Ferruh,
> >
> > Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these
> patches are for 19.05 release.
> > If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise
> I'll mark title to 19.08.
> 
> Got it, only there already patches on the backlog waiting from rc1 which sent
> the patch on time, they will be the priority otherwise it will be unfair to
> them, and I will work on this with best effort for 19.05.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ferruh

I understand, Thank you very much.

Thanks,
Gagan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-12  6:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-12  6:02 ` Gagandeep Singh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-12  6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev


> 
> 
> On 4/10/2019 12:12 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
> >> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing
> mode
> >>
> >> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
> >> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> >>> Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
> >>> don't care.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
> >>
> >> Hi Gagandeep,
> >>
> >> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
> >> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
> >>
> > Hi Ferruh,
> >
> > Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these
> patches are for 19.05 release.
> > If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise
> I'll mark title to 19.08.
> 
> Got it, only there already patches on the backlog waiting from rc1 which sent
> the patch on time, they will be the priority otherwise it will be unfair to
> them, and I will work on this with best effort for 19.05.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ferruh

I understand, Thank you very much.

Thanks,
Gagan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-10 11:12 Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-10 11:12 ` Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-10 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
  2019-04-10 14:13   ` Ferruh Yigit
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-04-10 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gagandeep Singh, dev

On 4/10/2019 12:12 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
>> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
>>
>> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
>> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
>>> Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
>>> don't care.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
>>
>> Hi Gagandeep,
>>
>> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
>> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
>>
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these patches are for 19.05 release.
> If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise I'll mark title to 19.08.

Got it, only there already patches on the backlog waiting from rc1 which sent
the patch on time, they will be the priority otherwise it will be unfair to
them, and I will work on this with best effort for 19.05.

Thanks,
ferruh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-10 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-04-10 14:13   ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-04-10 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gagandeep Singh, dev

On 4/10/2019 12:12 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
>> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
>>
>> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
>> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
>>> Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
>>> don't care.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
>>
>> Hi Gagandeep,
>>
>> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
>> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
>>
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these patches are for 19.05 release.
> If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise I'll mark title to 19.08.

Got it, only there already patches on the backlog waiting from rc1 which sent
the patch on time, they will be the priority otherwise it will be unfair to
them, and I will work on this with best effort for 19.05.

Thanks,
ferruh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
@ 2019-04-10 11:12 Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-10 11:12 ` Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-10 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-10 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
> 
> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> > Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
> > don't care.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
> 
> Hi Gagandeep,
> 
> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
> 
Hi Ferruh,

Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these patches are for 19.05 release.
If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise I'll mark title to 19.08.

Thanks,
Gagandeep Singh  

> Thanks,
> ferruh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-10 11:12 Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-10 11:12 ` Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-10 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-10 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 6:47 PM
> To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
> 
> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> > Support added for physical addressing mode and change driver flags to
> > don't care.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
> 
> Hi Gagandeep,
> 
> Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
> please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?
> 
Hi Ferruh,

Yes, it was my mistake I was little late while pushing patches. Actually these patches are for 19.05 release.
If it not bother you, could you please merge these patches to 19.05? otherwise I'll mark title to 19.08.

Thanks,
Gagandeep Singh  

> Thanks,
> ferruh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-08 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-08 11:22   ` Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-08 13:16   ` Ferruh Yigit
  2019-04-08 13:16     ` Ferruh Yigit
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-04-08 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gagandeep Singh, dev

On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> Support added for physical addressing mode and
> change driver flags to don't care.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>

Hi Gagandeep,

Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?

Thanks,
ferruh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-08 13:16   ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-04-08 13:16     ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-04-08 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gagandeep Singh, dev

On 4/8/2019 12:22 PM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> Support added for physical addressing mode and
> change driver flags to don't care.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>

Hi Gagandeep,

Since the patchset has been sent after RC1, I assume it is for 19.08. Can you
please mark patch title as 19.08 to not confuse with current release?

Thanks,
ferruh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-08 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] ENETC PMD basic features and bug fixes Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-08 11:22 ` Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-08 11:22   ` Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-08 13:16   ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-08 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: Gagandeep Singh

Support added for physical addressing mode and
change driver flags to don't care.

Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c   |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
index 023fe75..7a9a97d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2019 NXP
  */
 
 #include <stdbool.h>
@@ -334,14 +334,15 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 enetc_setup_txbdr(struct enetc_hw *hw, struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring)
 {
 	int idx = tx_ring->index;
-	uintptr_t base_addr;
 	uint32_t tbmr;
+	phys_addr_t bd_address;
 
-	base_addr = (uintptr_t)tx_ring->bd_base;
+	bd_address = (phys_addr_t)
+		     rte_mem_virt2iova((const void *)tx_ring->bd_base);
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBBAR0,
-		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBBAR1,
-		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBLENR,
 		       ENETC_RTBLENR_LEN(tx_ring->bd_count));
 
@@ -478,14 +479,15 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 		  struct rte_mempool *mb_pool)
 {
 	int idx = rx_ring->index;
-	uintptr_t base_addr;
 	uint16_t buf_size;
+	phys_addr_t bd_address;
 
-	base_addr = (uintptr_t)rx_ring->bd_base;
+	bd_address = (phys_addr_t)
+		     rte_mem_virt2iova((const void *)rx_ring->bd_base);
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBBAR0,
-		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBBAR1,
-		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBLENR,
 		       ENETC_RTBLENR_LEN(rx_ring->bd_count));
 
@@ -612,7 +614,7 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 
 static struct rte_pci_driver rte_enetc_pmd = {
 	.id_table = pci_id_enetc_map,
-	.drv_flags = RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING | RTE_PCI_DRV_IOVA_AS_VA,
+	.drv_flags = RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING,
 	.probe = enetc_pci_probe,
 	.remove = enetc_pci_remove,
 };
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
index 631e243..a31a387 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2019 NXP
  */
 
 #include <stdbool.h>
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 		txbd->buf_len = txbd->frm_len;
 		txbd->flags = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
 		txbd->addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
-		rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_addr +
+		rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
 				 tx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off);
 		i++;
 		start++;
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
 		rx_swbd->buffer_addr =
 			rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rx_ring->mb_pool));
 		rxbd->w.addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
-			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_addr +
+			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
 			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off;
 		/* clear 'R" as well */
 		rxbd->r.lstatus = 0;
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode
  2019-04-08 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode Gagandeep Singh
@ 2019-04-08 11:22   ` Gagandeep Singh
  2019-04-08 13:16   ` Ferruh Yigit
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gagandeep Singh @ 2019-04-08 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: Gagandeep Singh

Support added for physical addressing mode and
change driver flags to don't care.

Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c   |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
index 023fe75..7a9a97d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2019 NXP
  */
 
 #include <stdbool.h>
@@ -334,14 +334,15 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 enetc_setup_txbdr(struct enetc_hw *hw, struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring)
 {
 	int idx = tx_ring->index;
-	uintptr_t base_addr;
 	uint32_t tbmr;
+	phys_addr_t bd_address;
 
-	base_addr = (uintptr_t)tx_ring->bd_base;
+	bd_address = (phys_addr_t)
+		     rte_mem_virt2iova((const void *)tx_ring->bd_base);
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBBAR0,
-		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBBAR1,
-		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBLENR,
 		       ENETC_RTBLENR_LEN(tx_ring->bd_count));
 
@@ -478,14 +479,15 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 		  struct rte_mempool *mb_pool)
 {
 	int idx = rx_ring->index;
-	uintptr_t base_addr;
 	uint16_t buf_size;
+	phys_addr_t bd_address;
 
-	base_addr = (uintptr_t)rx_ring->bd_base;
+	bd_address = (phys_addr_t)
+		     rte_mem_virt2iova((const void *)rx_ring->bd_base);
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBBAR0,
-		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       lower_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBBAR1,
-		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)base_addr));
+		       upper_32_bits((uint64_t)bd_address));
 	enetc_rxbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_RBLENR,
 		       ENETC_RTBLENR_LEN(rx_ring->bd_count));
 
@@ -612,7 +614,7 @@ static int enetc_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 
 static struct rte_pci_driver rte_enetc_pmd = {
 	.id_table = pci_id_enetc_map,
-	.drv_flags = RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING | RTE_PCI_DRV_IOVA_AS_VA,
+	.drv_flags = RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING,
 	.probe = enetc_pci_probe,
 	.remove = enetc_pci_remove,
 };
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
index 631e243..a31a387 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2019 NXP
  */
 
 #include <stdbool.h>
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 		txbd->buf_len = txbd->frm_len;
 		txbd->flags = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
 		txbd->addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
-		rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_addr +
+		rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
 				 tx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off);
 		i++;
 		start++;
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
 		rx_swbd->buffer_addr =
 			rte_cpu_to_le_64(rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rx_ring->mb_pool));
 		rxbd->w.addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
-			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_addr +
+			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
 			       rx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off;
 		/* clear 'R" as well */
 		rxbd->r.lstatus = 0;
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-12  6:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-12  6:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-12  6:02 ` Gagandeep Singh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-10 11:12 Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-10 11:12 ` Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-10 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-10 14:13   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-08 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] ENETC PMD basic features and bug fixes Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-08 11:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] net/enetc: support physical addressing mode Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-08 11:22   ` Gagandeep Singh
2019-04-08 13:16   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-08 13:16     ` Ferruh Yigit

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).