From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A247A053B; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:31:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC711C0BC; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:31:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr130053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.13.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB591C0B9 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:30:58 +0100 (CET) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Mm08xnZ0RPUmWObw0M11GWFxcrIlxRvhPZieYyuMYtqDeZ4s1nvZMByYGgWfo9+emCaQOwMsALkRlh8cLohtnBaxOt04QjtEmnCBjEQTbcEaKO85pRkR5bDdjhY6mZcovJ9W0t/mPSIw4BE9ytxMbm2bvYPBlaF0FjVWj7YrjGQuGhcAtI4ShyPqexQrqrP7KyWvIHhqj2Hy6qK31PCZ997+ttN/C+yM9neTnngZEu2OcNpQrQXx20BGX1pizmiz3/yb19Rh2H/1gZn6mAs60inbENCpXpIvq/UOkUH5RkN1xTDsQuCy82iVfGziu6I2zok6yu7lvdzZXF3tE2zGNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m1Wo67u1u71g7esSHlaBlYKrPTRi+dk1J9WCYvD+N0k=; b=BbAMCMwAtxsxg/8jc3DSCEwIVzfKpImP85+BpJqSts6YeYtxETH5im4fFJbmkMiaw9qgDbU+2QSZetUF9l0kb5l6u6dPJCeP8MstmwdIc8Httv2bbmLxUyso38V+z71tTtFCBpbtdgmr/+biT8mxUjTmZMW0LF2dvNTFE/LTowbbT5XPu2qNUlLarPJHgKeZ2MF9sQDKcWeCUTVtlH1Qyt7KUXP0D0+OpZ8CMIHE4bzJjS3dSjLoEJPFVlauPN/BOvznAxUfS5MpLAnyT/KWnXp8nLagbsg7ogCht31o16otrKSWpUOWM+6i6eGmylI8iTuLhZGjbiw+ZE8ehbQVVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m1Wo67u1u71g7esSHlaBlYKrPTRi+dk1J9WCYvD+N0k=; b=fA+smsOsLETRFPHoa4k5zOSg+CmWO5Lz4NCD8fGtFSyeKH8Muwg2mn5jGMrQ7S+8B81NjuG0Erg6+XrE2i9KiwHnRtupswesacH0IqCGsQ5n84OSrZfLx+lD/HT5LNM2EcnQ9F7aCKC5uhMNBB0+Al0dr6rHBTRG/XTNJTGuXZQ= Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.11) by VE1PR04MB6558.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.232.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:30:57 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25b0:b1ac:aed0:63e1]) by VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25b0:b1ac:aed0:63e1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2707.023; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:30:57 +0000 From: Akhil Goyal To: Anoob Joseph , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Nicolau, Radu" , Thomas Monjalon CC: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Lukas Bartosik , Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: increase number of qps to lcore_params Thread-Index: AQHVx8TaARu+ZZNhakuhFPOtMRTCEKgCUt6AgAEyNwCAAZNSAIAACTEAgAAdNQCABBPLgIAAAWEQgAADWwCABM6PAIAACslQ Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:30:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1578667598-18942-1-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=akhil.goyal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [64.157.242.222] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: eabac074-2a19-45f9-5cbd-08d7aaf808bd x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6558: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-forefront-prvs: 0305463112 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(189003)(199004)(9686003)(71200400001)(55016002)(33656002)(81156014)(81166006)(52536014)(7696005)(8676002)(76116006)(8936002)(54906003)(110136005)(66556008)(5660300002)(66476007)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(4326008)(44832011)(86362001)(2906002)(186003)(498600001)(6506007)(26005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6558; H:VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: bNIkLO1lC5G/U7kwq0ZXXdZZcqKP7Xl3BP7ZqxWV0yyfPhQYBRDOI4L4fN3SO+I2CTIDG8PzHF1FuTVYeX5RRd4Mh1lQ9TVicjhIhXSs0WfwiBgE3rN9g+pQzZ54aPWOPDwof9foERMtltBzH3bI5KZ3lLzfth4NkjqRpsEHV4xcHlYKyCSEbBIQS4+cMhFdmQ39wYqXPs5ue3MtbvCeFvxy9ed5yKyM375pA8Wdq+aFMGwZ3kMCaL9mv3hMyOsvT2AgrkR/NOoS+xqJxxplNRbYBpe2sCH1WpD3kodmNspO/eSKPaz1hsQtVjeOIHltxr2PeM2gE5nXZzzqn/IkV5Lp7HMC1jecRwI8/Uzp04hESBQaMP+3bjrLac02z+xYEQaPub49yOo+uE22hyDcg1I8trKFUkgK24oVUd8JvrYE6WMRmbY1iXm6N8/Jv27G x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Tq3RozkRUR3fna/j7yJYBUWQnyFZrQwlOIHy9DyrUs3SGrKdNOyalH1d1JCn2VsPv+kkOVGVRyIdUB3Sei8CbYkIp0GV+l23vZ1qTP03ZPQwR5PHfpANPSnM9DtwBHmD2JkZssiuuHpaxQhh60MVDQ== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: eabac074-2a19-45f9-5cbd-08d7aaf808bd X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2020 11:30:56.9524 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: lEEX8RvLi0okm9lF4maQh/m8+yzeNhdBJo0rHGDjm6lQNmbluvgnVBHtudSgX9UOxEKjiNZXx/wLzqSiQdI7Zw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6558 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: increase number of qps to lcore_params X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >=20 > Hi Akhil, >=20 > > > > @Akhil, do you have any comments? > > > > > > > > Also, I think we should make it > > > > ,,,, > > > > > > > Looks good to me, but I believe this would need more changes and > > > testing in event patches. > > > Also it does not have any changes for lookaside cases. > > > Can we move this to next release and add lookaside case as well in a > > > single go. > > > > [Anoob] Not a problem. I'll defer this to next release then. >=20 > This patch is not part of the event additions to ipsec-segcw. This patch = is > required to handle few corner cases, but is equally applicable to lookasi= de > crypto as well. I had agreed to only deferring this patch. >=20 > Lukasz is preparing v4 of event mode patches with doc update and addressi= ng > one minor comment from Konstantin. If the event ipsec-secgw patches are n= ot > getting merged for this release, can you confirm it will be merged immedi= ately > after this release? I'm assuming you have finished the reviews as the pat= ch was > submitted early in this release cycle. >=20 I would say Lukasz should wait for sending the next version till I complete= the review. I will notify as soon as possible. I am not done with the review of the event patches yet. I need more time fo= r that. Yes, I believe these will be merged early in the next cycle. -Akhil