From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5E5A2EFC for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DED21C203; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.82]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1B11C114 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:42:35 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PoLQWC4KHecTC75WQDGCYsIZRYbkzfl4OTOxJerCibWiBi81QVNlf8aRKT3yeu+ytLFs2q69tPD6dKdrMsfV7pEixLL5cU1HQaoVITAaiEevdQYyZNDDkQl37hJG2URBEz9vA+JMKca4BPQGDqORbQ/Wf0bnmNZLxNnqsYWq7L9Ku9bIbReVX8EJm/iHPzINw7Dj9QFKBSsTRfWXrd2m/vITlaz3gx8DwtL4FvEQLtGPKWQ2+mtW9fesWuYU9662VLg+JZ63eAjbWqMU43ekpf7ThbqhVrl6742G7rmtH2fFqVTn4iUXyWrVdxFfYfLm9VEKqQoooFV0HOmEPYArlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Vh5FsMIAcal77s+gHN8H4XEjpvFql/8KZN2GE5Dmsg0=; b=EfXo3npbbl5lv+ZzkXIW1Ng5l7D57+GJ+EwgFbauFC8DHI1CnUmG6d2a1yDDOnQKAUfA9H/3Rnhnp+efppLK4Br7/iUqFEq9swOWjAGJTQx8WRNlrZTvQ4M94I+5VV5t+Yib3nMiLcSNTnJLGf7YKj7l5RQPNwl8St57qhq22B7CNmI30woVKOQjVRuiC42oCKWufvcerf5bJHA2pusynQdubWCzdmGTztx7YMa5RKhaj3t5b/uPbMMpj0lK2ctuPNsO10MPevU6aOioz0NkW7TAnrsNULscdYUXuD8T+Ukrg513ySKdOsUipviCMpqakVnOS9WwA45DmvzKgLnsMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Vh5FsMIAcal77s+gHN8H4XEjpvFql/8KZN2GE5Dmsg0=; b=BN0zUrZrfxS2BwjZi/tJUvLokbhjbIAH+WyyeAWxPWeLZSwpQTiCjNc/KUvegUqnKCDVlTJwZvRFefgqcAQ0S1ysWmWqVOahQt/vJSb8KKuyfQUM2AhvE+2ACVdmcR3+p9hg+ZXQRUtYxh8gg+GinFD6t7/mYMjiAHJX4g8NFzg= Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.11) by VE1PR04MB6669.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.235.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:42:34 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee]) by VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:42:34 +0000 From: Akhil Goyal To: Thomas Monjalon CC: Bernard Iremonger , "dev@dpdk.org" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default Thread-Index: AQHVeGtwa0h85gmQX0WS5PacJv4Ia6dVb/tggAAu0ACABbdw0A== Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:42:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1567069173-10505-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <5630388.AILYuOXkcA@xps> In-Reply-To: <5630388.AILYuOXkcA@xps> Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=akhil.goyal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [92.120.1.65] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0c56bae5-7c20-4375-bf0a-08d7513adc69 x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6669: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 01917B1794 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(53754006)(64756008)(305945005)(54906003)(74316002)(316002)(6506007)(14444005)(256004)(446003)(486006)(44832011)(3846002)(6116002)(66476007)(66556008)(66446008)(33656002)(7736002)(86362001)(52536014)(11346002)(476003)(7696005)(478600001)(14454004)(76176011)(186003)(102836004)(2906002)(66946007)(26005)(76116006)(99286004)(81166006)(8936002)(25786009)(4326008)(55016002)(81156014)(8676002)(6916009)(6436002)(5660300002)(9686003)(6246003)(4744005)(71200400001)(66066001)(229853002)(71190400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6669; H:VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Cgm1nODPMpDK2syTZALJ/2kNBgcojSKIA9QnU/NZeawtsHh4zdPXn1G8WHkF9KyGUfDDX05Q1e2ZREaEAP7RCOdFvtUF1/p03mN/PspmmWXbHmgyvQggE3eAABODDZYkJpPqURGodxl4hDlker6Lerhi4gZh2mRVMwypnqkma81/EaGOhST8yW8ommRhD0ZYI4wXfKDsdP9OdqBmdus6VV/shqxUwDoz86jMLJcfEQ21KPHWprG7c0Dbj7xyejogvL0udhpjUGK1IHqpa5tavcz2zoBnjDBsIau4pKQDl0dAU1gxrLbV5mJNWu9Po/cC6IgYznx4mffJZXnFpMGEN4cKemyhmXuzXfbmgbgj6V4vfYu6uUdGWEE89kj9F77yp2oSsDt8WiwyDnmQ9AWZIkM32PR4qgcM8lRhc/QrlPo= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0c56bae5-7c20-4375-bf0a-08d7513adc69 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Oct 2019 06:42:34.2965 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: W6Lckq6zBqrqVdo/e2mSS2f7B/5EVNSQHJ8bGAERAQhsvAeXdqnquOorWIbsZc/VRqHu3MqkRXf4iWnY74mYqg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6669 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >=20 > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal: > > Hi All, > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact user > experience > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to customer= s. > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality added e= very > release. > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. >=20 > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a default in = this > example? >=20 We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would request ot= her Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers.