From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"tdu@semihalf.com" <tdu@semihalf.com>,
"rnagadheeraj@marvell.com" <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
"adwivedi@marvell.com" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB31687DEB4FC98396D92D2B67E6A70@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB28809D1E73023B73468A5C3EE4A70@SN6PR11MB2880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Fiona,
>
> Hi Akhil,
>
> >
> > Some wireless algos like SNOW, ZUC may support input
> > data in bits which are not byte aligned. However, not
> > all PMDs can support this requirement. Hence added a
> > new feature flag RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_NON_BYTE_ALIGNED_DATA
> > to identify which all PMDs can support non-byte aligned
> > data.
> [Fiona] I know it's a bit pedantic, but shouldn't this really be called
> NON_BYTE_MULTIPLE?
>
> As a non-byte-multiple data set could have its start byte-aligned, but still not be
> supported.
>
The intention is to have both start as well as end to be byte aligned.
Is there some PMD which can support unaligned byte data but still multiples of byte?
BTW I did not see any example in the current test cases which support unaligned bytes data.
Regards,
Akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 21:58 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data Akhil Goyal
2020-05-05 9:57 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-05-05 10:12 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2020-05-05 12:04 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported non-byte aligned cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported SG cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported sessionless cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported session Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] test/crypto: run PDCP cases if supported Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] test/crypto: remove dpaaX_sec specific testsuites Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] test/crypto: remove QAT specific check Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] test/crypto: remove unused variable Akhil Goyal
2020-05-05 14:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-05-08 8:55 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-05-09 23:57 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 9:29 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-05-11 10:10 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 9:54 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-05-11 10:05 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 14:40 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported non-byte aligned cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported SG cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported sessionless cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported session Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] test/crypto: run PDCP cases if supported Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] test/crypto: remove dpaaX_sec specific testsuites Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] test/crypto: remove QAT specific check Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] test/crypto: remove unused variable Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v2 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup Anoob Joseph
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB31687DEB4FC98396D92D2B67E6A70@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=G.Singh@nxp.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tdu@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).