Re: [dpdk-dev] [v6 1/2] cryptodev: support enqueue & dequeue callback functions

[Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>]

Hi Abhinandan,
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> >
> > 03/11/2020 08:44, Gujjar, Abhinandan S:
> > > From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> > > > As I suggested 2 times that there are documentation issues. Haven't
> > > > seen a version To fix that. Please check it at your end and try
> > > > fixing the timing of your system so that CI Can pick it for compilation.
> > >
> > > As far as I remember, I have pulled in all the comments from you for the
> > previous patch.
> > > >
> > > > > I understand that we work in same time zone, getting feedback from
> > > > > you in the mid night will not help me/you to pull this patch in.
> > > > > A quick response will enable me to prepare patch set quickly and
> > > > > send it
> > > > across.
> > > >
> > > > I am not dedicatedly working on your patchset. I will work as per my
> > priorities.
> > >
> > > It is same for me. End of the day, we have mutually agreed to get this
> feature
> > in.
> > >
> > > > Had it been a CI pass for compilation for both documentation and
> > > > code, it would have been applied last night. I could remove those
> > > > extra spaces, but there are other issues also as the newly added
> > > > APIs are not visible in html files generated. Please ensure that
> > > > there are no issues in doxygen build issues and should be able to see the
> > newly added APIs in html guides.
> > >
> > > This is the kind of information I was looking for, which was not
> > > available in your previous patch. If this info had been available quickly, I
> > would have prepared next patchset.
> >
> > It seems you didn't do all the checks you are required to do.
> > Please be kind with Akhil who is working hard for the community.
> > If you want to accelerate the process, help by reviewing other patches.
> >
> I have done enough follow ups with Akhil and we both agreed to get this into
> RC2.
> I did not realize that CI did not pick up the patches because of mismatch with my
> system time.
> All I am saying is giving this information would have helped me.

I highlighted the documentation issue and the system timing on Friday itself.
When the fix was not there on Monday, I tried to fix on my side which took me late
To comment back. Had it been done by CI, it would have been faster.

> 
> > > Anyway, I will post the next patch set.
> >
> > This is too late.
> > We are not supposed to add new API in -rc2, and for sure not after -rc2
> > deadline.
> >
> > > >
> > > > And please note, do not top post your comments. It becomes difficult
> > > > to read it in Archives.
> > >
> > > Ok
> >
> > Yes please do not top post, use --in-reply-to to gather all versions in the same
> > thread, and fix the clock of your machine.
> Ok
> >
> >