DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
To: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: remmap UAR address for multiple process
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:16:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR05MB167848979D84494AEB6AF733ACE30@VI1PR05MB1678.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123133108.b2uhpfjaaalfhsqq@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nélio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:31 PM
> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remmap UAR address for multiple process
> 
> Hi Xueming,
> 
> My lonely comments are more related to the commit log which should be re-
> written to be more accurate to the issue you try to address, even if this
> patch does not solves it.

The current situation is that UAR locates inside top area of address space,
VERY easy to conflicts in secondary process, this patch address that with 
less conflicts.

Similar to hugepage mapping in secondary, no good solution to resolve it 
completely, correct? But it always good to add this warning in commit log.

> 
> Please see below,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:50:42AM +0000, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
> > Hi Nelio,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nélio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:53 PM
> > > To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
> > > Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remmap UAR address for multiple
> > > process
> > >
> > > Hi Xueming,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:08:54PM +0800, Xueming Li wrote:
> > > > UAR(doorbell) is hw resources that have to be same address between
> > > > primary and secondary process, failed to mmap UAR will make TX
> > > > packets invisible to HW.
> > > > Today, UAR address returned from verbs api is mixed in heap and
> > > > loaded library address space, prone to be occupied in secondary
> process.
> > > > This patch reserves a dedicate UAR address space, both primary and
> > > > secondary process re-mmap UAR pages into this space.
> > > > Below is a brief picture of dpdk app address space allocation:
> > > > 	Before			This patch
> > > > 	------			----------
> > > > 	[stack]			[stack]
> > > > 	[.so, uar, heap]	[.so, heap]
> > > > 	[(empty)]		[(empty)]
> > > > 	[hugepage]		[hugepage]
> > > > 	[? others]		[? others]
> > > > 	[(empty)]		[(empty)]
> > > > 				[uar]
> > > > 				[(empty)]
> > > > To minimize conflicts, UAR address space comes after hugepage
> > > > space with an offset to skip potential usage from other drivers.
> > >
> > > Seems it is not the case when the memory is contiguous, according to
> > > what I see in my testpmd /proc/<pid>/maps:
> > >
> > >  PMD: mlx5.c:523: mlx5_uar_init_primary(): Reserved UAR address space:
> > > 0x0x7f4da5800000
> > >
> > > And the fist huge page is at address 0x7f4fa5800000, new UAR space
> > > is before and not after.
> > >
> > > With this patch I still have the situation described as "before".
> > >
> >
> > Your observation is correct, system is allocating address in a
> > high-to-low manner like stack. UAR address range 0x0x7f4da5800000 -
> > 0x0x7f4ea5800000, 4GB size, With another 4G offset, hugepage range start
> is 0x7f4fa5800000.
> 
> From what I understand, remapping the UAR pages to an address before the
> huge pages reduce the situation where the secondaries process cannot start.
> This patch does not fix the fact it may fail.
> 
> Your small display of the memory mapping between before and after seems
> not accurate depending on the OS being run, on Linux v4.14 from debian9
> S.I.D. I am still on the situation before no matter how many time I
> restart the process.  For that I'll suggest you to remove it.
> 
> > > > Once UAR space reserved successfully, UAR pages are re-mmapped
> > > > into new area to keep UAR address aligned between primary and
> > > > secondary
> > > process.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c         | 107
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h         |   1 +
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h    |  10 ++++
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h    |   3 +-
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c |   7 ++-
> > > >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c     |  51 +++++++++++++------
> > > >  6 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> > > > index
> > > > fc2d59fee..1539ef608 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> > > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > > >  #include <stdlib.h>
> > > >  #include <errno.h>
> > > >  #include <net/if.h>
> > > > +#include <sys/mman.h>
> > > >
> > > >  /* Verbs header. */
> > > >  /* ISO C doesn't support unnamed structs/unions, disabling -
> pedantic.
> > > > */ @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@  #include <rte_pci.h>  #include
> > > > <rte_bus_pci.h> #include <rte_common.h>
> > > > +#include <rte_eal_memconfig.h>
> > > >  #include <rte_kvargs.h>
> > > >
> > > >  #include "mlx5.h"
> > > > @@ -466,6 +468,101 @@ mlx5_args(struct mlx5_dev_config *config,
> > > > struct rte_devargs *devargs)
> > > >
> > > >  static struct rte_pci_driver mlx5_driver;
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Reserved UAR address space for TXQ UAR(hw doorbell) mapping,
> > > > +process
> > > > + * local resource used by both primary and secondary to avoid
> > > > +duplicate
> > > > + * reservation.
> > > > + * The space has to be available on both primary and secondary
> > > > +process,
> > > > + * TXQ UAR maps to this area using fixed mmap w/o double check.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void *uar_base;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Reserve UAR address space for primary process
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @param[in] priv
> > > > + *   Pointer to private structure.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @return
> > > > + *   0 on success, negative errno value on failure.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int
> > > > +mlx5_uar_init_primary(struct priv *priv) {
> > > > +	void *addr = (void *)0;
> > > > +	int i;
> > > > +	const struct rte_mem_config *mcfg;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (uar_base) { /* UAR address space mapped */
> > > > +		priv->uar_base = uar_base;
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +	/* find out lower bound of hugepage segments */
> > > > +	mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG && mcfg->memseg[i].addr; i++) {
> > > > +		if (addr)
> > > > +			addr = RTE_MIN(addr, mcfg->memseg[i].addr);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			addr = mcfg->memseg[i].addr;
> > >
> > > This if/else is useless as addr is already initialised with the
> > > smallest possible value.
> >
> > That's my original code :-) and I always get addr zero then.
> > Addr here is the lower bound of hugepage, we don't want addr to keep
> zero.
> 
> Indeed, I mix my mind the min and max.
> 
> > > > +	}
> > > > +	/* offset down UAR area */
> > > > +	addr = RTE_PTR_SUB(addr, MLX5_UAR_OFFSET + MLX5_UAR_SIZE);
> > >
> > > Seems the error is here, the loops get the address of the memseg
> > > with the smallest address and then it subtract the UAR size, addr
> > > cannot be after the huge pages unless if this subtraction overflows.
> >
> > Thanks, my word "after" is something like address alloction order, the
> > UAR block under "hugepage" on the overall picture.
> 
> There is no guarantee that the system will allocate from the end to the
> beginning.  After means having an address higher than the reference,
> otherwise it is not after but before.
> 
> > > > +	/* anonymous mmap, no real memory consumption */
> > > > +	addr = mmap(addr, MLX5_UAR_SIZE,
> > > > +		    PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> > > > +	if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > > +		ERROR("Failed to reserve UAR address space, please
> adjust "
> > > > +		      "MLX5_UAR_SIZE or try --base-virtaddr");
> > >
> > > How does a user knows the UAR memory space the NIC needs to adjust
> > > the MLX5_UAR_SIZE?
> > >
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +	/* Accept either same addr or a new addr returned from mmap if
> > > target
> > > > +	 * range occupied.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	INFO("Reserved UAR address space: 0x%p", addr);
> > >
> > > The '%p' already prefix the address with the 0x.
> > >
> > > > +	priv->uar_base = addr; /* for primary and secondary UAR re-
> mmap */
> > > > +	uar_base = addr; /* process local, don't reserve again */
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nélio Laranjeiro
> > > 6WIND
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Nélio Laranjeiro
> 6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-19 15:08 Xueming Li
2018-01-22 14:53 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-01-23  9:50   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2018-01-23 13:31     ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-01-23 14:16       ` Xueming(Steven) Li [this message]
2018-01-25 15:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: mmap uar address around huge pages Xueming Li
2018-01-25 16:01   ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-01-25 16:33     ` Shahaf Shuler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR05MB167848979D84494AEB6AF733ACE30@VI1PR05MB1678.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xuemingl@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).