From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com [207.82.80.143]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C411BC33C for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:20:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lrp0020.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.20]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-8-nud8nnkDQfG4rizPImtwFQ-1; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:20:54 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arm-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=0ZcoIm0jOb4LXGsJURh/9z0Czjp48XfPfIGSZjPtzdE=; b=is9eP8RgkuWs+QeFHraIvABEoiBIY2KWfUsNgy2t+SdSjThWWVgXvR6zt6zgdNLZ3gwy/0Qo+kMnQfvQmk77W3+kOMhOqAlakGFBk2wCQ5q7jLnHC6x3yZFNZx0Oju5+p4M+XgRXRtRU2AXOOkrjdOGgpIZ/4JSo7JRFlFXCZuU= Received: from VI1PR08MB0576.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.17.14) by VI1PR08MB0574.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.17.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.403.16; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:20:53 +0000 Received: from VI1PR08MB0576.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.17.14]) by VI1PR08MB0576.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.17.14]) with mapi id 15.01.0403.016; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:20:53 +0000 From: Bob Monkman To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Laura Kempke , Michael Dolan Thread-Topic: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation Thread-Index: AdFVXyFj11EFHpfSTbKwlEqRJimLqQKNzxugACcBTSAAATyakAAAi5zQ Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:20:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674AA240@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674B1F8C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674B2711@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674B2711@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [24.6.130.118] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR08MB0574; 5:5G7mQAcQQXjkiJpk74nQ9UzuL7ngDoLvlQGXNAES46+k7OPDRCOFnEKJZUG2C8DdxQAONFgUmZV3Zre/jUSBoIcA3LFA1/EIxn3L2BnBUvSKHlRPsy1ClD8IFjfzo9j18sVod36ZBmSzrj5oxTZ8Vg==; 24:QIC23NKGa8LELUIOVZE83UZDZeRzuv5wFs07qhd77jWRC4Rfuca3cEWcFX2FIPGb5JlQ/Ay/BK4saZyoTenIpKwfNcpH7EilWLzCAYfip0Q=; 20:bu1twsCN7TMew9f/6ZKEfJRMFNV79WZEM6FnyIMmec+szvPzi9D5RLMrwUICU7a7Vdf/hu3G34zTmPVw9hL6lcniwfkaXXyY1i/X5fpjhIoDxeJez7cTcQIbpPcNIF5JB3wjTOo3cAztuojHBhjAqjWAXcetvb/ROXm6cJtHr/M= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR08MB0574; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 53b7575c-8f21-44d1-7acd-08d32e50b364 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(180628864354917); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:VI1PR08MB0574; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR08MB0574; x-forefront-prvs: 0843C17679 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(13464003)(50854003)(40434004)(377454003)(52044002)(11100500001)(5890100001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(93886004)(77096005)(15975445007)(122556002)(40100003)(86362001)(5001770100001)(54356999)(189998001)(76176999)(107886002)(5001960100002)(50986999)(33656002)(561944003)(2501003)(87936001)(5003600100002)(2906002)(5004730100002)(74316001)(66066001)(3846002)(3280700002)(5002640100001)(1096002)(586003)(5008740100001)(76576001)(1220700001)(6116002)(102836003)(5002510100001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(92566002)(10400500002)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR08MB0574; H:VI1PR08MB0576.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Feb 2016 17:20:52.2902 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR08MB0574 X-MC-Unique: nud8nnkDQfG4rizPImtwFQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:20:56 -0000 Right. Yes, I can access it just fine. Thx, Robert (Bob) Monkman Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 -----Original Message----- From: O'Driscoll, Tim [mailto:tim.odriscoll@intel.com] Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 9:09 AM To: Bob Monkman; dev@dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman@arm.com] > Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev@dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan > Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation > > Thanks very much for the minutes. Can we get Laura's draft deck re: > budget and tradeoffs/options? There's no slide deck, just the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/a/l= inuxfoundation.org/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnX= cLg/edit?usp=3Dsharing. This outlines the minimum (column B) and optional (= column C) alternatives that Laura presented on Tuesday. I believe access to the spreadsheet is open to everybody, but if anybody ru= ns into issues I'm sure Laura can help to grant access. Tim > > Robert (Bob) Monkman > Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager > 150 Rose Orchard Way > San Jose, Ca 95134 > M: +1.510.676.5490 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation > > Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies > for the delay in sending these out. > > Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit, > Jim St Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin > Ananyev, Laura Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn, > Tetsuya Mukawa, Thomas Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima > Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people > joined/left at different times it may not be complete. > > > The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the > Userspace event in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a > lightweight governance model for DPDK. This would cover marketing, > event planning, trademarks, other legal issues etc. It would not cover > any technical governance of the project. > > Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group > of us (Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin, > me) met with the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is > available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1- > 3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=3D302618256. > > Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B > represents the minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k. > Column C shows a number of optional additions and totals $766k. Points > of discussion > included: > - The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered > by registration fees and sponsorship. > - Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't > currently included (row 23) but could be added if desired. > - The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general > consensus seemed to be that we wouldn't need these. > > Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd > be looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate > membership fee of ~$15-25k. > > There was a question on what member companies would get in return for > their contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the > likelihood is that they would get a seat on a board which would > determine how the DPDK budget is spent. The scope of this board would > be limited to marketing/event/legal issues. Technical governance would > continue to be handled separately via our Maintainers and our > Architecture Board. > > Most people on the call felt that the proposal to use LF was a good > idea and was worth pursuing further. However, we only had a small > number of people on the call so that may not be representative of the > views of the entire community. Therefore, if anybody has further > thoughts or input on this, please feel free to reply to this email. > > Keith suggested holding a poll so that we can quantify the level of > interest and give people a way to provide feedback anonymously in case > they're unwilling to do so in public. I'll look into this. > > Feel free to post any corrections or additions if I missed anything. > > > Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim > > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation > > > > At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed > that > > a few of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a > > light-weight governance of DPDK. This would include things like > > management of DPDK events, registering trademarks, and any required > > legal support etc. > > > > Stephen, Thomas, Dave, Vincent and I met with the Linux Foundation > > to discuss this and came up with a draft budget proposal. We'd like > > to > have > > a community call to discuss this and decide how we should proceed. > > > > The current budget estimate is ~$227k. LF guidance is that for this > size > > of budget they'd propose a flat membership fee (i.e. no tiered > > membership) of ~$25k per member company, with a target of getting 10 > or > > more companies to contribute. > > > > At the call we can discuss: > > - A breakdown of the proposed budget. LF are very flexible on this, > > so we can add or remove whatever we want for DPDK. > > - Proposed membership fee. > > - Matthew also highlight some recent changes to community > representation > > at the Linux Foundation. We should discuss any concerns associated > with > > this. > > - Next steps. > > > > > > When: > > Tue, Feb 2, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT > > Tue, Feb 2, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST > > Tue, Feb 2, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST > > Tue, Feb 2, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET > > > > > > How to join: > > You can join from a computer, tablet or smartphone: > > https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/474154717 > > > > You can also dial in by phone. > > Access Code: 474-154-717 > > > > More phone numbers > > United States : +1 (312) 757-3126 > > Australia : +61 2 9087 3604 > > Austria : +43 7 2088 1400 > > Belgium : +32 (0) 92 98 0592 > > Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350 > > Denmark : +45 69 91 80 05 > > Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778 > > France : +33 (0) 182 880 456 > > Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7313 > > Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180 > > Italy : +39 0 247 92 12 39 > > Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 379 > > New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358 > > Norway : +47 21 03 58 96 > > Spain : +34 911 82 9782 > > Sweden : +46 (0) 313 613 558 > > Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96 > > United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028 > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose > the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or > copy the information in any medium. Thank you. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confid= ential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, p= lease notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any= other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in = any medium. Thank you.