From: Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 1/2] mk: fix cross build errors
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:41:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB31673A070BF634EB5E17B8F38F6C0@VI1PR08MB3167.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3248809.BvU3dfXijd@xps>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 4:32 PM
> To: Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
> Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] mk: fix cross build
> errors
>
> 30/05/2018 04:45, Gavin Hu:
> > From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:45:55PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 28/05/2018 15:24, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > > Would a simpler solution for this not be to put "-Wno-implicit-
> > > fallthrough"
> > > > > for pmdinfogen? GCC will not give a warning for an unrecognised "-
> Wno"
> > > > > flag when compiling, unless there are other errors. This means
> > > > > we can just use the flag without bothering with version checks.
> > > >
> > > > No, it does not work.
> > > > I have this error with clang 5.0.1:
> > > > error: unknown warning option '-Wno-format-truncation'
> > > >
> > > Yes, you still need to check for GCC to use the flag, just not for a
> > > specific version of GCC.
> > >
> > > /Bruce
> > [Gavin Hu] Hi Thomas, '-Wno-format-truncation' is applied to gcc only, not
> to clang.
> > Gcc, icc and clang have their own WERROR_FLAGS, they should not mix up
> with each other.
>
> Now I understand what we missed from the beginning: I am testing with
> meson.
> This flag is added unconditionnaly in config/meson.build.
[Gavin Hu] Hi Thomas and Bruce, then do you have more comments on the v5 patch?
Any comments are welcome, if no, can you act the patches for merging?
>
> > @Bruce,
> > Yes, in this sense, I am really concerned about to add -Wno-implicit-
> fallthrough option in the pmdinfogen Makefile, as it impacts not only gcc, but
> also clang and icc.
> > Maybe this not a best solution, as maybe it is not supported by all
> compilers. So should I fall back to the previous patch which check for the gcc
> version and apply the options for gcc only?
>
>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 2:45 Gavin Hu
2018-05-30 8:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-30 9:41 ` Gavin Hu [this message]
2018-05-30 10:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-29 7:21 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] *** cross gcc fix and guide doc *** Gavin Hu
2018-05-29 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] *** cross gcc compile fix and add a " Gavin Hu
2018-05-29 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] mk: fix cross build errors Gavin Hu
2018-05-29 15:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB31673A070BF634EB5E17B8F38F6C0@VI1PR08MB3167.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).