From: Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>, Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] net/i40e: auto-vectorization to speed up Tx free
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:03:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB5376DC62F03B8903E9633EAA8FE00@VI1PR08MB5376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1Om8CE=SZVF4J88d=VFAAK9j2xMSOB81j5nzFAchA-uEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jerin,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 3:45 PM
> To: Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
> Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>; nd <nd@arm.com>; David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; thomas@monjalon.net;
> jerinj@marvell.com; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>; Joyce Kong
> <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>; Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] net/i40e: auto-vectorization to
> speed up Tx free
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:35 AM Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tx mbuf free is a hotspot for i40e on aarch64, as there are no
> > inter-loop dependencies, it is safe to enable auto-vectorization
> > to speed up.
> >
> > This patch showed 2~3% performance lift on ThunderX2 and no
> degradation
> > on Arm N1SDP. The test case is single core RFC2544 zero-loss test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > index 0e6ffa007..fc0fa45d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
> > if (likely(m != NULL)) {
> > free[0] = m;
> > nb_free = 1;
> > +#if defined(__clang__)
> > +#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)
> > +#elif defined(__GNUC__)
> > +#pragma GCC ivdep
> > +#endif
>
> IMO, It is better to abstract the compiler features (above compiler
> feature and __restrict__) as macros in
> rte_common.h or so. It will help to support other compilers(ICC or
> Windows) and enable them to have "changes" in one place.
How about defining RTE_LOOP_AUTO_VECTORIZATION in the rte_common.h?
#if defined(__clang__)
define RTE_LOOP_AUTO_VECTORIZATION \
#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)
#elif defined(__GNUC__)
define RTE_LOOP_AUTO_VECTORIZATION \
#pragma GCC ivdep
#else
define RTE_LOOP_AUTO_VECTORIZATION
#endif
If you agree, I will submit a v2. Thanks for your comments!
/Gavin
>
>
>
> > for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
> > m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > if (likely(m != NULL)) {
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-07 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 5:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] i40e vPMD optimization on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-03-06 5:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] net/i40e: relax barrier in the Tx fastpath of vPMD Gavin Hu
2020-03-06 9:11 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-03-06 5:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] net/i40e: restrict pointer aliasing for neon vec Gavin Hu
2020-03-06 5:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] net/i40e: auto-vectorization to speed up Tx free Gavin Hu
2020-03-06 7:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-03-06 9:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-07 15:03 ` Gavin Hu [this message]
2020-03-09 7:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-03-09 9:23 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-13 15:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] i40e NEON vPMD optimization on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-13 15:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/i40e: relax barrier in Tx fastpath for NEON vPMD Gavin Hu
2020-04-13 15:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/i40e: restrict pointer aliasing " Gavin Hu
2020-04-20 14:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-21 9:51 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-13 16:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] i40e NEON vPMD optimization on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-15 6:50 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-04-13 16:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/i40e: relax barrier in Tx fastpath for NEON vPMD Gavin Hu
2020-04-13 16:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: restrict pointer aliasing " Gavin Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB5376DC62F03B8903E9633EAA8FE00@VI1PR08MB5376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Joyce.Kong@arm.com \
--cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).