DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Lior Margalit <lmargalit@nvidia.com>,
	Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] config: make max memzones definition configurable
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:05:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+oZiHYdAu8vfLvd@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212085319.693689-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Ophir Munk wrote:
> In current DPDK the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE definition is unconditionally hard
> coded as 2560.  For applications requiring different values of this
> parameter – it is more convenient to set its value as part of the meson
> command line rather than changing the dpdk source code per application.
> An example would be of an application that uses the DPDK mempool library
> which is based on DPDK memzone library.  The application may need to
> create a number of steering tables, each of which will require its own
> mempool allocation.
> This commit adds a meson optional parameter named max_memzones. If not
> specified - it is set by default to 2560. The hard coded definition of
> RTE_MAX_MEMZONE is removed. During meson build time the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE
> can be optionally defined as the value of max_memzones parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>
> ---
> RFC:
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230130092302.376145-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com/
> 
>  config/meson.build  | 1 +
>  config/rte_config.h | 1 -
>  meson_options.txt   | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12  8:53 Ophir Munk
2023-02-13 11:05 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2023-02-13 13:55   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-13 14:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-13 17:04       ` Ophir Munk
2023-02-21 10:28         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+oZiHYdAu8vfLvd@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lmargalit@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).