Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Specify C-standard requirement for DPDK builds

[Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:09:14AM -0500, Ben Magistro wrote:
>    Since this topic keeps coming up in other threads I'll chime in with my
>    $0.01 here.  We've been using CentOS 7 for awhile (and working on
>    migrating off) but have had to leverage devtoolset/llvmtoolset for
>    various reasons.  I remember a discussion of installing a different
>    compiler coming up but don't remember which thread that was in/what the
>    outcome was.  While I'd like to just brush over C7 and say there is a
>    compatible compiler available so just make the change I also realize
>    that making that change could be quite disruptive to existing code
>    bases.
>    However, the 22.11 LTS will be EOL in Nov 2024.  CentOS 7 is EOL Jun
>    2024.  For the 23.x series and going forward I don't think starting
>    with a C11 requirement is an unreasonable ask.
> 
Thanks for that input. If we drop support for Centos/RHEL 7, I think we
should be ok to pass -std=c11 for the build of DPDK.

Have you any thoughts on the second part of the c11 move - where our
headers require c11 support and therefore may require that the end user
builds their own code using -std=c11? This latter part is the bit that
concerns me a little, as I feel it may be problematic for some with older
codebases.

/Bruce