DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liang Ma <liangma@liangbit.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question Of binutils-avx512-check
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:55:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKd1iQP9BENlfqtk@C02F33EJML85> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKdtKZ4f5rrpKOMF@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:19:53AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 08:56:50AM +0100, Liang Ma wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:04:06AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 20/05/2021 23:22, Liang Ma:
> > > > Hi All, 
> > > >    I try to build DPDK with debug  build-type but the building process is
> > > >    failed becuase of AVX512 code from librte-acl. The release build type
> > > >    is fine. Hence, I dig a bit into the avx512 enabling logic of meson.
> > > > 
> > > >    I found the main logic is implemented inside binutils-avx512-check.sh.
> > > > 
> > > >    It looks the script focus on checking the compatiblity of tools-chain
> > > >    instead of CPUID. My problem is current script will produce avx512
> > > >    code even I build dpdk on AMD platform. I understand the avx512 code
> > > >    may not be used in runtime. I just wonder why we can not check the
> > > >    cpuid as well ?
> > > 
> > > The same binary can be run on multiple CPUs,
> > > so it makes no sense to check the compilation CPUID in generic compilation.
> > > For native build, why not.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, your problem is at compilation, not runtime, right?
> > Yes, the problem is at compilation. 
> > Given X86_64, gcc-6.30, Debug build always failed due
> > to librte_acl AVX512 code. I hope there is a graceful switch allow
> > developer disable avx512 in certain circumstance.
> 
> Add ACL maintainer on CC. Sounds like there is a problem with the AVX512
> support detection for acl library. Looking at the meson build code, other
> drivers, such as i40e, do their avx512 detection differently from ACL.
there are 2 concerns here: 
1. librte_acl specific issue cause the debug building failure with gcc 6.30.
2. More generic, if that's possible to have a graceful switch for avx512.(e.g. build option) 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 21:22 Liang Ma
2021-05-21  7:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-21  7:56   ` Liang Ma
2021-05-21  8:19     ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-21  8:55       ` Liang Ma [this message]
2021-05-21  9:07         ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-21  9:56           ` Liang Ma
2021-05-21  9:52         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-05-21 10:01           ` Liang Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKd1iQP9BENlfqtk@C02F33EJML85 \
    --to=liangma@liangbit.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).