From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C50A0C49; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:41:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B668406FF; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:41:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E31406B4 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:41:16 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10037"; a="196461424" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,331,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="196461424" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2021 05:41:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,331,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="491701971" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.4.148]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Jul 2021 05:41:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:41:04 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: David Marchand Cc: dev , Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Message-ID: References: <20210701093456.43426-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20210702125554.606364-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: create runtime dir even when shared data is not used X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:35:15PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:39 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > Should this change be applied to FreeBSD too? > > > > > Yes it should. :-( For some reason I assumed that this would not be relevant > > for FreeBSD, but I obviously should have double-checked the code! > > Ok, how do you want to handle it? > > Should I go with this revision and you send a followup patch for > FreeBSD after rc1? > Or can you send a v2 this afternoon? > > This series does not seem that risky, so we could wait for rc2 too. > I'll send a v2 this afternoon.