From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mbuf: mark old VLAN offload flags as deprecated
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:10:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW0sA/isJebL7PHu@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a779f5da-0875-76b6-be93-500eedba91eb@oktetlabs.ru>
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:50:50AM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/15/21 10:24 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > The flags PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT and PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT are
> > marked as deprecated since commit 380a7aab1ae2 ("mbuf: rename deprecated
> > VLAN flags") (2017). But they were not using the RTE_DEPRECATED
> > macro, because it did not exist at this time. Add it, and replace
> > usage of these flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>
> I'd remove these flags completely. 4 years is definitely
> enough. Yes, I realize that because of missing
> RTE_DEPRECATED markup users were not warning on build.
I kept them because David pointed me that these flags are still used by
other projects. Adding an explicit RTE_DEPRECATED() would prevent this,
and... it doesn't bother to add one more year :)
Thank you for the review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 21:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] mbuf: offload flags namespace Olivier Matz
2021-09-29 21:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] mbuf: remove deprecated offload flags Olivier Matz
2021-10-04 8:29 ` David Marchand
2021-10-04 9:46 ` Olivier Matz
2021-09-29 21:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] cocci: add cocci script to rename mbuf " Olivier Matz
2021-09-29 21:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] mbuf: add rte prefix to " Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 19:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] mbuf: offload flags namespace Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 19:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mbuf: remove duplicate definition of cksum offload flags Olivier Matz
2021-10-16 7:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15 19:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mbuf: mark old VLAN offload flags as deprecated Olivier Matz
2021-10-16 7:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-17 14:46 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-18 8:10 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-10-18 11:15 ` Somnath Kotur
2021-10-15 19:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cocci: add cocci script to rename mbuf offload flags Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 19:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] mbuf: add rte prefix to " Olivier Matz
2021-10-16 7:57 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-17 14:45 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-18 11:15 ` Somnath Kotur
2021-10-24 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] mbuf: offload flags namespace David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YW0sA/isJebL7PHu@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).