DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:43:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWmFamQMfwOz0lNd@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR12MB50917626B909B5204EF35EF5B9B99@CH0PR12MB5091.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0000, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +static int
> > > +test_mempool_flag_non_io_set_when_no_iova_contig_set(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct rte_mempool *mp;
> > > +     int ret;
> > > +
> > > +     mp = rte_mempool_create_empty("empty", MEMPOOL_SIZE,
> > > +                                   MEMPOOL_ELT_SIZE, 0, 0,
> > > +                                   SOCKET_ID_ANY,
> > MEMPOOL_F_NO_IOVA_CONTIG);
> > > +     RTE_TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mp, "Cannot create mempool: %s",
> > > +                              rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> > > +     rte_mempool_set_ops_byname(mp, rte_mbuf_best_mempool_ops(), NULL);
> > > +     ret = rte_mempool_populate_default(mp);
> > > +     RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret > 0, "Failed to populate mempool: %s",
> > > +                     rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> > > +     RTE_TEST_ASSERT(mp->flags & MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO,
> > > +                     "NON_IO flag is not set when NO_IOVA_CONTIG is
> > set");
> > > +     rte_mempool_free(mp);
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > 
> > One comment that also applies to the previous patch. Using
> > RTE_TEST_ASSERT_*() is convenient to test a condition, display an error
> > message and return on error in one operation. But here it can cause a
> > leak on test failure.
> > 
> > I don't know what is the best approach to solve the issue. Having
> > equivalent test macros that do "goto fail" instead of "return -1" would
> > help here. I mean something like:
> >   RTE_TEST_ASSERT_GOTO_*(cond, label, fmt, ...)
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> This can work with existing macros:
> 
> 	#define TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(...) goto fail
> 
> Because of "trace" in the name it looks a bit like a hijacking.
> Probably the macro should be named TEST_HANDLE_FAILURE
> to suggest broader usages than just tracing,
> but for now it looks the most neat way.

That would work for me.
What about introducing another macro for this usage, that would
be "return -1" by default and that can be overridden?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18  9:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  3:12   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:34     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12  6:06       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration dkozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  6:33       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12  9:37         ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  9:46           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  3:37       ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12  6:42       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 12:40         ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 12:53           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 13:11             ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  8:52         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:13           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 13:08           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 12:12         ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:07           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:40             ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:01         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:18           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:33             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:38               ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:43               ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15  9:58                 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 12:11                   ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15  9:25         ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 10:42           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 11:41             ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 12:13               ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:19         ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:27           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:43             ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-10-19 13:08               ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20  9:29           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20  9:30           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-29  3:30                 ` Jiang, YuX
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 14:36                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWmFamQMfwOz0lNd@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).