From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] build/eal: add OS defines for C conditional checks
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:03:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbiH+Esps7O3WlIY@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214015803.763d30d1@sovereign>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 01:58:03AM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> 2021-12-10 14:53 (UTC+0000), Bruce Richardson:
> [...]
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
> with one typo below and some considerations for the future in the bottom.
>
> > +Defines to Avoid Conditional Compilation
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +In many cases in DPDK, one wants to optionally compile code based on the target platform,
> > +or runtime environment.
>
> "Compile" -> "run", that's the point to use conditionals instead of macros.
>
> > +While this can be done using the conditional compilation directives,
> > +e.g. ``#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUX``, present in DPDK for many releases,
> > +this can also be done in many cases using regular ``if`` statements and the following defines:
>
> > +
> > +* ``RTE_ENV_FREEBSD``, ``RTE_ENV_LINUX``, ``RTE_ENV_WINDOWS`` - these define ids for each operating system environment.
> > +* ``RTE_EXEC_ENV`` - this defines the id of the current environment, i.e. one of the items in list above.
> > +* ``RTE_EXEC_ENV_IS_FREEBSD``, ``RTE_EXEC_ENV_IS_LINUX``, ``RTE_EXEC_ENV_IS_WINDOWS`` - 0/1 values indicating if the current environment is that specified,
> > + shortcuts for checking e.g. ``RTE_EXEC_ENV == RTE_ENV_WINDOWS``
> [...]
>
> I wonder whether #if RTE_EXEC_ENV_IS_xxx
> should be preferred over #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_xxx,
> so that all checks use the same symbol
> (and then remove old macros one day).
>
> Since C conditionals are preferred over #ifdef,
> I suggest to give pointers when to use one or another mechanism:
>
> If a code fragment can compile on all platforms,
> but cannot run on some due to lack of support,
> branch on constants.
>
> If a code fragment cannot compile on all platforms
> (e.g. use of OS-specific headers or macros),
> but constitutes only a small fraction of the file,
> use conditional compilation.
>
> If a group of functions implement an interface
> in an OS- or platform-specific way,
> create a file for each of the supported environments
> and plug an appropriate file from ``meson.build``.
Good suggestions. I rework into a v2 when I get the chance.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 14:53 Bruce Richardson
2021-12-13 7:21 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-12-13 22:58 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-14 12:03 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2021-12-16 15:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2022-01-17 18:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbiH+Esps7O3WlIY@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).